Religion
In reply to the discussion: A Note on Tax Exemptions for Churches [View all]qazplm135
(7,608 posts)It's a really, really weak argument, but fine, let's go with it.
Taxing someone is at LEAST MORE control than not taxing them yes?
The whole point of the Free Exercise Clause is limiting government control over religion as much as possible, if not eliminating it.
You all seem to be arguing that's impossible when it comes to taxation because it's all "control."
Like I said, sorry but that's a really bad argument, but even if I were to buy that not taxing is still control (it isn't), taxing is absolutely control.
People get the benefits of things they don't necessarily pay for in multiple ways.
even if you don't pay your property taxes, the police and fire departments generally still respond. Getting a benefit of something is not control, and it is not "subsidizing" religion for the purposes of the 1st Amendment's Establishment Clause.
Taxation absolutely is control, and it absolutely interferes or has the great potential to interfere with Free Exercise.