Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MineralMan

(150,482 posts)
6. Yes, absolutely.
Thu May 10, 2018, 01:30 PM
May 2018

I've been a science geek since I was a little kid. I didn't make a career of it, but I've never stopped learning. You're right. Without a fundamental understanding of whatever science interests you, you won't have enough foundational knowledge to read current publications. If you're not intensely interested in a subject, you won't bother.

I recognize that most people just aren't that interested in any of the sciences. It's just not their thing. I am interested, though, and always have been. I can read the journals, and do, in areas of interest to me. In current physics, I can no longer follow the math, but I can work around that, and simply assume that they got that part right. In medicine, that's not a problem, really, and that's a field I stay current in as well. I'm a cosmology buff, too, and that's among the most interesting fields of all. Again, the math has gone way beyond what I truly understand, but I can work around that, too.

I don't expect people to have the same interest I do in the sciences. I know they don't.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»The Recurring Problem wit...»Reply #6