Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
In reply to the discussion: Mormon Church Threatens Critic With Excommunication [View all]beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)35. Starboard Tack has been blocked from the Atheist and Agnostic group:
Starboard Tack has been blocked from the Atheist and Agnostic group.
Although we have resisted for quite some time, we feel that it's time to block Starboard Tack from the Atheist and Agnostic group. Even though I strongly dislike Starboard Tack, I argued internally for him to remain. But the community has made it very clear that he is not wanted, and the hosts both agree that now is the time for a block. The reasons are enumerated below.
(NOTE: this thread will be pinned and locked for one week.)
1. Starboard Tack made no mention that he was married to cbayer, another DUer who is blocked from our group. A lie by ommission is still a lie, and the fact that he now claims that everyone knew is disengenuous.
2. On more than one occasion Starboard Tack made subtly transphobic and homophobic statements. Not only that, he continued to defend those statements in the face of numerous protests.
3. Starboard Tack has acted as an apologist for religion. That's okay in the Religion group, but not here where the members want to get away from that sort of thing we all deal with on a daily basis.
4. A warning* was provided to Starboard Tack that he needed to behave himself. He ignored that warning.
5. Gravedancing is offensive, and really was the straw that broke the camel's back for us.
*In the interest of transparency, here is the full text of the PM sent to Starboard Tack:
As you may be aware, a thread asking the hosts of A&A to block you from the group was posted this evening. We asked the OP to self-delete and he did, but the situation is thus:
Multiple members of the A&A group have PM'd us asking if we can block you from the group. So far we have responded to these requests by saying that we're hoping that you'll start behaving in a more civil manner and since you have been on the verge of breaking some of the stated rules but have yet to completely cross the line, we are willing to give you the benefit of the doubt.
That said, the posted thread adds two names to the list of people who feel that you are only in the A&A group to disrupt. Please consider this an only warning--try to be more civil or risk being blocked from the group.
http://metamorphosis.democraticunderground.com/12308879
Although we have resisted for quite some time, we feel that it's time to block Starboard Tack from the Atheist and Agnostic group. Even though I strongly dislike Starboard Tack, I argued internally for him to remain. But the community has made it very clear that he is not wanted, and the hosts both agree that now is the time for a block. The reasons are enumerated below.
(NOTE: this thread will be pinned and locked for one week.)
1. Starboard Tack made no mention that he was married to cbayer, another DUer who is blocked from our group. A lie by ommission is still a lie, and the fact that he now claims that everyone knew is disengenuous.
2. On more than one occasion Starboard Tack made subtly transphobic and homophobic statements. Not only that, he continued to defend those statements in the face of numerous protests.
3. Starboard Tack has acted as an apologist for religion. That's okay in the Religion group, but not here where the members want to get away from that sort of thing we all deal with on a daily basis.
4. A warning* was provided to Starboard Tack that he needed to behave himself. He ignored that warning.
5. Gravedancing is offensive, and really was the straw that broke the camel's back for us.
*In the interest of transparency, here is the full text of the PM sent to Starboard Tack:
As you may be aware, a thread asking the hosts of A&A to block you from the group was posted this evening. We asked the OP to self-delete and he did, but the situation is thus:
Multiple members of the A&A group have PM'd us asking if we can block you from the group. So far we have responded to these requests by saying that we're hoping that you'll start behaving in a more civil manner and since you have been on the verge of breaking some of the stated rules but have yet to completely cross the line, we are willing to give you the benefit of the doubt.
That said, the posted thread adds two names to the list of people who feel that you are only in the A&A group to disrupt. Please consider this an only warning--try to be more civil or risk being blocked from the group.
http://metamorphosis.democraticunderground.com/12308879

Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
103 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The Mormon Church is one of the biggest funders of those who favor anti-LGBT laws.
merrily
Jan 2015
#58
Mormon individuals, yes. An example of that is what this thread is about. Not the Mormon church.
merrily
Jan 2015
#69
My post was about the current positions and acts of the Church, not its individual dissidents.
merrily
Jan 2015
#80
The mormon church has a history of doing that when the government holds a gun to its head.
AtheistCrusader
Mar 2015
#91
If the mormon church is wrong about this, then it cannot pretend to hold revealed truth.
AtheistCrusader
Mar 2015
#89
Keep pretending non-belief and XYZ belief belong 'on the table' together.
AtheistCrusader
Jan 2015
#24
Just because someone has a "right" to an idea, doesn't mean that idea is sacrosanct.
Major Nikon
Jan 2015
#25
IMO, a religion's requires secrecy from its members about religious beliefs and
merrily
Jan 2015
#56
An event that is, basically, what I suggested a long time ago, and that you attacked me about.
AtheistCrusader
Jan 2015
#26
You weren't banned from A&A for 'stepping out of line', and you know it.
AtheistCrusader
Jan 2015
#27
Really? I think calling out the bullies, bigots and cyber stalkers was too much for some.
Starboard Tack
Jan 2015
#31
You can't even go two posts in a thread fork without contradicting yourself.
AtheistCrusader
Jan 2015
#63
I hope the entirety of DU is reading this thread, and your posts in particular, very carefully.
AtheistCrusader
Jan 2015
#66
I hope so too. Your obsession with me and distorting what I said is quite extraordinary
Starboard Tack
Jan 2015
#67
Starboard Tack has been blocked from the Atheist and Agnostic group:
beam me up scottie
Jan 2015
#35
LOL. Didn't realize Starboard Tack was ex-communicated from th A&A Group. I'm out of that loop.
pinto
Jan 2015
#38
Whoa, did you miss the point or what. BMUS, I think I ought to step out of this 3rd party side talk.
pinto
Jan 2015
#40
Thanks for the repost. I stand by that, silly as it may be. I made my point. Others misconstrued it.
Starboard Tack
Jan 2015
#49
Except I support same sex marriage and always have. I support all consensual marriage
Starboard Tack
Jan 2015
#54
No, you don't support consensual marriage. You just defended a post where you attacked people
AtheistCrusader
Jan 2015
#57
Oops sorry! Did I attack bigots who want to tell me who or what I'm allowed to marry?
Starboard Tack
Jan 2015
#62
Your 'point' perfectly overlaps with one of the classic right wing anti-same-sex-marriage talking
AtheistCrusader
Jan 2015
#64
My you think highly of yourself. I actually don't give a fuck about you at all.
beam me up scottie
Mar 2015
#98
If it were up to me he would have been banned from DU for his homophobic posts.
beam me up scottie
Mar 2015
#100
I appreciated the guy's talk a lot. Found some of it condescending and paternalistic.
pinto
Jan 2015
#17
Many religions are paternalistic and a hell of a lot worse than condescending to
merrily
Jan 2015
#59