Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Writing

valerief

(53,235 posts)

16. Absence of critical thinking, perhaps? Maybe it's not what's there but what's not there.

Reply to IDemo (Reply #13)

Sun Aug 4, 2013, 03:18 PM

Aug 2013

Our culture doesn't value critical thinking. Additionally, it demands instant everything, including instant judgments, lest we appear stupid, which we are, because we can't think critically.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

16 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

I'm looking for a word or phrase [View all] IDemo Jul 2013 OP

This would seem to fall under 'stereotype'. PoliticAverse Jul 2013 #1

While it may work in some situations, not exactly what I'm after IDemo Jul 2013 #3

counter-indicative? Chan790 Jul 2013 #2

Sounds somewhat clinical, but it is from a psych book after all IDemo Jul 2013 #4

something like an invalid negative characterization or generalization...? NRaleighLiberal Jul 2013 #5

Again, not one word, SheilaT Jul 2013 #6

pigeon-hole Sanity Claws Jul 2013 #7

Oooh, I like that. SheilaT Jul 2013 #8

Synecdoche? Generalization? valerief Jul 2013 #9

Would "typecast" work? (eom) Petrushka Jul 2013 #10

This sounds a lot like dispositional attribution. NuclearDem Aug 2013 #11

Thanks, I think that puts me on the right track IDemo Aug 2013 #14

labelling unedited Aug 2013 #12

I guess I need to reset a bit here. IDemo Aug 2013 #13

Umbrageous? joshcryer Aug 2013 #15

Absence of critical thinking, perhaps? Maybe it's not what's there but what's not there. valerief Aug 2013 #16