Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

relayerbob

(7,020 posts)
11. It's complex
Wed Mar 1, 2023, 07:03 PM
Mar 2023

It would depend on whether the art is actually public domain or is owned by the estate of the artists, or someone else. And then, the Church may need to give permission, also. The fact that they are displaying the art, doesn't mean they own the copyright to it. Most likely they wouldn't. Similar to how my owning a CD doesn't give me any rights under copyright law, expect to make personal copies for myself only for archival purposes. I'm sure the book publisher knows that these things are complex and convoluted and the research alone would likely cost them more than they could ever hope to make off of your sale ... not counting any potential litigation. They can't take your word for it, because as someone else noted, they are the ones selling you the book, so they would be on the hook for it.

In any case, you might be better off incorporating it into a really good Word or PDF document and sending it out. While still not actually legal, since no money is changing hands, the worst you would likely get is a case-and-desist, assuming someone learned about it and cared enough to bother with doing that, which would be unlikely.

copyright has nothing to do with if the book is for public or private. anything you create has msongs Mar 2023 #1
I am willing to do this. And to state it is for private use only. CTyankee Mar 2023 #2
You are paying them to copy the art and sell it to you Effete Snob Mar 2023 #3
Book Baby did my first book which was the same format and type of content. CTyankee Mar 2023 #6
Was all of the art in existence prior to 1923? Effete Snob Mar 2023 #9
no. Some of the later works were in the 50s and 60s. CTyankee Mar 2023 #10
Unless it is your personal art ... relayerbob Mar 2023 #4
Not that it matters, but my book shows the art and discussses the artist's ideas, motivation, etc. CTyankee Mar 2023 #5
That someone has posted art on the internet is also not relevant relayerbob Mar 2023 #7
This would be typical of what I write: CTyankee Mar 2023 #8
It's complex relayerbob Mar 2023 #11
I thought about having BB make just one copy and then I could pass it around at family events. CTyankee Mar 2023 #12
Going back to the argument "no better than stealing someone's car." CTyankee Mar 2023 #13
Actually, no, not correct relayerbob Mar 2023 #14
Stolen art is one of my favorite subjects. People who want to steal it usually do so thinking CTyankee Mar 2023 #15
You are intentionally bypassing the point relayerbob Mar 2023 #16
Thank you for your comments. CTyankee Mar 2023 #17
Since you have "mentioned" this, I will call your attention to this: CTyankee Mar 2023 #18
Don't equate yourself with the National Gallery of Art relayerbob Mar 2023 #19
Moi aussi. CTyankee Mar 2023 #20
Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Non-Fiction»need a private publisher ...»Reply #11