Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

relayerbob

(7,019 posts)
7. That someone has posted art on the internet is also not relevant
Wed Mar 1, 2023, 04:24 PM
Mar 2023

By doing so, they are violating copyright. If you want to do such a book, you would need to get written permission from the current owners of the copyrights for the work, or prove that the art is in the public domain.

Your opinions in the book are your intellectual property, to which you hold all rights. Use of art in a college environment can be construed as Fair Use, but only in the academic sense, and even there, there are strict limits about what you can and can't do. In many/most cases, reputable schools have negotiated exemptions or pay general use royalties to allow people to use material from, say, their library.

I'm sure your project is well done and was created in good faith, but in the end, it's just not allowed, and never has been. In books I have written, when using anything more than a very short quote, I've asked for and obtained the permission in writing (yes, emails are valid) to actually show their work, or quote their words.

Sorry if I seem a little pedantic on it, but as an author, patent holder, IP rights are very important to me, and while I know you weren't planning anything commercial through your work, it's still their property, regardless of who else is abusing that out on the Internet.

copyright has nothing to do with if the book is for public or private. anything you create has msongs Mar 2023 #1
I am willing to do this. And to state it is for private use only. CTyankee Mar 2023 #2
You are paying them to copy the art and sell it to you Effete Snob Mar 2023 #3
Book Baby did my first book which was the same format and type of content. CTyankee Mar 2023 #6
Was all of the art in existence prior to 1923? Effete Snob Mar 2023 #9
no. Some of the later works were in the 50s and 60s. CTyankee Mar 2023 #10
Unless it is your personal art ... relayerbob Mar 2023 #4
Not that it matters, but my book shows the art and discussses the artist's ideas, motivation, etc. CTyankee Mar 2023 #5
That someone has posted art on the internet is also not relevant relayerbob Mar 2023 #7
This would be typical of what I write: CTyankee Mar 2023 #8
It's complex relayerbob Mar 2023 #11
I thought about having BB make just one copy and then I could pass it around at family events. CTyankee Mar 2023 #12
Going back to the argument "no better than stealing someone's car." CTyankee Mar 2023 #13
Actually, no, not correct relayerbob Mar 2023 #14
Stolen art is one of my favorite subjects. People who want to steal it usually do so thinking CTyankee Mar 2023 #15
You are intentionally bypassing the point relayerbob Mar 2023 #16
Thank you for your comments. CTyankee Mar 2023 #17
Since you have "mentioned" this, I will call your attention to this: CTyankee Mar 2023 #18
Don't equate yourself with the National Gallery of Art relayerbob Mar 2023 #19
Moi aussi. CTyankee Mar 2023 #20
Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Non-Fiction»need a private publisher ...»Reply #7