Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Fiction

In reply to the discussion: 11/22/63 [View all]

PoindexterOglethorpe

(27,021 posts)
5. I could not finish it either.
Sat Nov 25, 2023, 12:58 AM
Nov 2023

The problem with Stephen King is that some years back he was able to refuse to be edited, and ever since then his books are at least 40% too long.

When I was reading it, I kept on thinking that the narrator was simply not noticing the difference between his time, and when he went back to. Example: in the present smoking is not very common, doesn't happen in public inside spaces. In the past, many more people smoked and they smoked everywhere. I'm a non-smoker, and so if I went back I'd be seriously annoyed by all the cigarette smoke. I bet a smoker would think he'd died and gone to heaven.

Here's a better change of history novel: Making History by Stephen Fry. It involves making sure Adolf Hitler is never born, Amazing book.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

11/22/63 [View all] Docreed2003 Nov 2023 OP
I hate to be disagreeable, but murielm99 Nov 2023 #1
You're fine, everyone has different takes on books Docreed2003 Nov 2023 #2
You might enjoy also dweller Nov 2023 #3
Awesome, thanks for the recommendation. I'll check it out Docreed2003 Nov 2023 #4
I could not finish it either. PoindexterOglethorpe Nov 2023 #5
Part of that "not noticing the differences" Docreed2003 Nov 2023 #6
Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Fiction»11/22/63»Reply #5