was 'Hey, I bet we can sell more butter if there's a picture of a chick that dude's wanna f*** on the label'.
Especially since the % of butter purchased by men in stores in 1928 was maybe 20% at most (my guess).
OTOH, there's 2 solid, reasonable arguments against this label:
1) Images like these should only be used by Native-owned companies at their own discretion. For others to do so is unfair cultural appropriation, and/or
2) Images of women (of any sort) on their knees offering up foodstuffs is a negative stereotype of women, implying they are subservient, belong in the kitchen, etc.
Making additional claims that the label 'goes hand in hand with sex trafficking' is over the top, and undermines your valid arguments by making you sound extreme. You just give people a reason to disregard what you said before, that made perfect sense, and was rhetorically sustainable.
In MY opinion.
Like I said, agree to disagree 
Edit history
= new reply since forum marked as read