Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Seniors

rsdsharp

(10,710 posts)

7. The only thing I can think is that New Hampshire doesn't

Reply to elleng (Reply #6)

Wed Aug 4, 2021, 01:48 PM

Aug 2021

stack adverse possession time from previous owners to new ones. If that’s the case, he would start over with a new owner, and hasn’t met the elements. If he refused to vacate under those circumstances, it could result in contempt.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

12 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

81-year-old facing eviction from cabin he's lived in for 27 years due to trespassing claim [View all] peppertree Aug 2021 OP

oh, FFS. The 'new owner' (fuck him and HE IS 86!) needs to lighten the F up and let him stay. CurtEastPoint Aug 2021 #1

+1 peppertree Aug 2021 #3

Can't Be Called A Squatter...As He's Lived There Nearly Thirty Years wyn borkins Aug 2021 #2

This sounds like a pretty good case of adverse possession. rsdsharp Aug 2021 #4

THANKS! elleng Aug 2021 #6

The only thing I can think is that New Hampshire doesn't rsdsharp Aug 2021 #7

Makes 'sense,' in that respect. elleng Aug 2021 #8

He claims he had permission Effete Snob Aug 2021 #10

It's not adverse at all Effete Snob Aug 2021 #9

'jailed since July 15 on a civil contempt sanction.' elleng Aug 2021 #5

Why all the praise for a squatter? PoindexterOglethorpe Aug 2021 #11

For crissakes XanaDUer2 Aug 2021 #12