Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Kaleva

(38,983 posts)
5. The lightweight allowed it to carry a gun big enough to knock out Panthers and Tigers
Wed Aug 1, 2018, 02:39 PM
Aug 2018

It was cheaper to build and easier to maintain then the Pershing and more of them could be sent transported overseas then Pershings. Sometimes quantity is a quality all of its own.

The Sherman was inferior to the Panther but we had lots of them. Even the celebrated T34/85 was a death trap for its crew and was built just well enough to fight in 1 or maybe 2 battles before being knocked out or breaking down.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Veterans»The tale of Sgt Melvin C....»Reply #5