Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: Please support the National African American Gun Association. [View all]krispos42
(49,445 posts)10. "Military style" is basically meaningless
The features you want to ban:
- keeps losing us elections
- doesn't save lives.
- doesn't drive Democratic turnout
- does drive Republican turnout
- are an arbitrary and moving standard
- doesn't stop mass shootings
- doesn't lower the crime rate
- damages our credibility
- doesn't lower new-gun sales
- keeps Republicans in power
- moves the Republican agenda forward
Let's face it... those "military" features are just ergonomics. Would you be happy if your office chair had a fixed height? How about if it didn't swivel? Or recline?
I'm going to presume that, given a choice, you'd order for your office a chair that has adjustable height, that swivels, has castors, reclines, has adjustable-height armrests, and that you can adjust the backrest forwards or backwards. And I'll bet you really like that little knob under the seat that adjusts how much spring tension is being applied to the reclining backrest.
Okay, then why are you so intent on making pistol grips on a rifle or shotgun illegal? It's a more comfortable design than a traditional straight stock. I mean, jeez, we don't ban PISTOLS, even though 90% of gun homicides are done with a handgun, but you want to ban pistol grips on long guns?
And quick-adjustable buttstocks. Why? People are different sizes, they wear different amounts of clothing, and they shoot from different positions. Why is a buttstock that I can simply lengthen or shorten without tools an "assault weapon" feature?
A bayonet-mounting lug. Really? When has criminal bayonet use EVER been a factor to worry about? But it's an "assault weapon" feature.
If you boss one day got rid of all the old chairs and replaced them with new ones were of a fixed height, that didn't recline, and didn't swivel, you'd probably be pissed. Especially if the reason the boss gave was a bullshit, emotional one.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
33 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
seriously? i don't support guns beyond the absolute minimum. Who cares who's organization is
samsingh
Jun 2020
#3
That may be what it takes! Wouldn't it be nice if all guns were heavily regulated.
BComplex
Jun 2020
#6
Absolutely not true. When assault rifles were banned during Clinton, we had far fewer deaths.
BComplex
Jun 2020
#21
Your inability to answer questions speaks volumes and is an answer. n/t
discntnt_irny_srcsm
Jun 2020
#27
Quoting one's own prior statements and simply reiterating them only demonstrates
friendly_iconoclast
Jun 2020
#30
Gun control advocates here have *always* been willing to elide and defend racism...
friendly_iconoclast
Jun 2020
#18