Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: How the NRA Rewrote the 2nd Amendment -- The Founders never intended to create unregulated guns [View all]friendly_iconoclast
(15,333 posts)28. Lots of obvious propaganda techniques, little to no actual evidence
This kid was killed in DC in part because Scalia and the Republican judges prevented DC from regulating guns properly.
Scalia and Roberts and Alito and Thomas contributed to THIS KIDs death. This kid. Right here. Scalia bears responsibility for his death.
Scalia and Roberts and Alito and Thomas contributed to THIS KIDs death. This kid. Right here. Scalia bears responsibility for his death.
Argument by repeated assertion, aka "argumentum ad nauseum"
Argument by vehemence:
http://www.don-lindsay-archive.org/skeptic/arguments.html#vehemence
Being loud. Trial lawyers are taught this rule:
If you have the facts, pound on the facts.
If you have the law, pound on the law.
If you don't have either, pound on the table.
The above rule paints vehemence as an act of desperation. But it can also be a way to seize control of the agenda, use up the opponent's time, or just intimidate the easily cowed.
If you have the facts, pound on the facts.
If you have the law, pound on the law.
If you don't have either, pound on the table.
The above rule paints vehemence as an act of desperation. But it can also be a way to seize control of the agenda, use up the opponent's time, or just intimidate the easily cowed.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appeal_to_pity
An appeal to pity (also called argumentum ad misericordiam, the sob story, or the Galileo argument) is a fallacy in which someone tries to win support for an argument or idea by exploiting his or her opponent's feelings of pity or guilt. It is a specific kind of appeal to emotion.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
88 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
How the NRA Rewrote the 2nd Amendment -- The Founders never intended to create unregulated guns [View all]
sharedvalues
May 2019
OP
The fact that Scalia redacted 1/2 of the 2nd Amendment to support his "originalist" view
guillaumeb
May 2019
#3
True, but he did need to dismiss 1/2 of the Amendment to support his claimed originalist argument.
guillaumeb
Jun 2019
#16
President Obama, HRC and Bernie Sanders have all said the 2A protects an individual right
hack89
Jun 2019
#17
"(Y)ou will not smear them or Waldman." My my, aren't *we* full of ourselves!
friendly_iconoclast
May 2019
#6
Ahem. You don't actually *get* to shape others' replies to you. Also...
friendly_iconoclast
Jun 2019
#27
"Pastor Robert Jeffress Says Disney Supports 'Murdering Children'...
friendly_iconoclast
Jun 2019
#36
"If the gun restrictionists quit aping the fetus fetishists, the meme will go away."
friendly_iconoclast
Jun 2019
#43
Lots of obvious propaganda techniques, little to no actual evidence
friendly_iconoclast
Jun 2019
#28
Blatant propaganda and cheap appeals to pity don't move me, and never have
friendly_iconoclast
Jun 2019
#33
Sounds like the gestation slavers claiming that Roe v Wade ought to be overturned
friendly_iconoclast
Jun 2019
#48
I'm neither impressed nor intimidated by mere bluster and chronic logorrhea
friendly_iconoclast
Jun 2019
#53
You are laser focused on Miller and ignoring my other arguments in this thread.
MarvinGardens
Jun 2019
#77
It seems Con Law lectures at Internet Search Engine University focus on Miller...
friendly_iconoclast
Jun 2019
#78
Well, when you only have one decision, rendered because the defendant died, and the defense didn't
AtheistCrusader
Jun 2019
#81
Once again, you've demonstrated that pious fraud is part and parcel of gun control advocacy
friendly_iconoclast
Jun 2019
#49
"(Miller) did not say that militia service is required for gun ownership." True...
friendly_iconoclast
Jun 2019
#56
You weren't to notice those inconvenient details amidst all the bluster and handwaving
friendly_iconoclast
Jun 2019
#60
re: "Republicans love guns because gun identity politics gets people...
discntnt_irny_srcsm
Jun 2019
#25
Miller is no more valid today than Minersville School District v. Gobitis
friendly_iconoclast
Jun 2019
#50
And if it was, we'd all have the right to own an Army-issue (and fully automatic) M4...
friendly_iconoclast
Jun 2019
#59
"a unorganized militia is NOT well regulated. It could not possibly be what madison intended"
friendly_iconoclast
Jun 2019
#61
Evangelists of all stripes want believers, not thinkers. Thinkers tend to ask pesky questions...
friendly_iconoclast
Jun 2019
#87