Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: United States v. Miller, 307 U.S. 174 (1939) [View all]aikoaiko
(34,202 posts)32. Two comments.
1. If Miller had shown up for the court case and demonstrated that short-barrelled rifles were useful in trench warfare, they very well might have struck down the NFA for SBS. But no one showed up.
2. An unorganized militia can be well-regulated if folks show up with the weapons they'll need to defend themselves from oppression. The unorganized militia can be defined in many different ways, but the founders intended that regular folks have the firearms they needed to staff a militia if needed. That's why they said the people shall have the right, not the militia.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
44 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations