Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: United States v. Miller, 307 U.S. 174 (1939) [View all]discntnt_irny_srcsm
(18,578 posts)31. re: "This 1939 supreme court ruling on miller was UNANIMOUS."
"...we cannot say that the Second Amendment guarantees the right to keep and bear such an instrument."
In the literal wording of the text of the unanimous decision:
- "we cannot say" Echoing the court's acknowledgment that neither evidence nor argument from the defense was offered.
- "right to keep and bear such an instrument" Not encompassing arms in general nor firearms specifically. The decision was in light only regarding the sawed off shogun.
"...an unorganized militia is NOT well regulated."
This is your opinion not the Supreme Court's.Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
44 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations