Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: United States v. Miller, 307 U.S. 174 (1939) [View all]discntnt_irny_srcsm
(18,578 posts)29. An example of an article with internal inconsistencies
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/12/18/18146455/trump-bump-stock-ban-gun-violence
The Trump administration just banned bump stocks for guns
More than a year after the Las Vegas mass shooting, bump stocks are officially set to become illegal.
Notice the title uses the past tense "banned" while the first sentence refers to the future.
More than a year after the Las Vegas mass shooting, bump stocks are officially set to become illegal.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
44 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations