Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: Gunsplaining to conservatives [View all]discntnt_irny_srcsm
(18,605 posts)37. you're opinion here would be interesting
you're words:
"I've argued often here the ar15 & its .223 rockets should be banned due to light recoil."
Politically, we mostly discuss the civilian terms "assault weapon and assault rifle" regarding restriction and regulation. Would it be fair to infer from your position, above, that a semi auto rifle firing .223 having a recoil energy below a certain amount would be subject to extra regulation while a somewhat similar rifle firing the same round with a higher recoil energy would not?
I know there would be figuring about what that energy would be but there might be something quantifiable in that reasoning that could serve as a point of discussion/negotiation.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
46 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations