Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

unblock

(54,397 posts)
5. this is pretty stupid.
Fri Jun 8, 2018, 11:14 AM
Jun 2018

judges can ban guns from their court*rooms*, but not from the court*house*.

so if a courthouse has three courtrooms in it, then they need to have three sets of metal detectors and staff, instead of just one.

so basically the decision says that the right of enhanced concealed-carry license holders to carry a gun specifically in the courthouse but outside of a courtroom outweighs the state's additional practical expenses as well as the security of the courthouse personnel, including court*room* personnel who no doubt need step outside the courtroom from time to time.


more fundamentally, the decision says that the court can do nothing to protect itself or any of the participants in the legal process beyond the reach of the interior walls of the courtroom. they can't protect witnesses or the jury pool (until they enter the courtroom), for instance, and to hell with staff.

courts should respond by declaring the lobby to be a courtroom so everyone has to pass through it and a single security point.








Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Mississippi Supreme Court...»Reply #5