Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: Thank you Diane Feinstein [View all]spin
(17,493 posts)55. Gun control advocates have been trying to ban certain firearms for decades. ...
Brady Campaign
***snip***
The Brady Campaign was founded in 1974 as the National Council to Control Handguns (NCCH). From 1980 through 2000 it operated under the name Handgun Control, Inc. (HCI). In 2001, it was renamed the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, and its sister project, the Center to Prevent Handgun Violence, was renamed the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence.
***snip***
Mark Borinsky founded the National Council to Control Handguns in 1974. He served as Chair until 1976. Charlie Orasin was a key player in the founding and growth of Handgun Control (HCI). He worked at HCI from 1975 until 1992.[9]
Nelson "Pete" Shields became the organization's chairman in 1978 and retired in 1989.
***snip***
In July 1976, Shields estimated that it would take seven to ten years for NCCH to reach the goal of "total control of handguns in the United States." He said: "The first problem is to slow down the increasing number of handguns being produced and sold in this country. The second is to get handguns registered. And the final problem is to make the possession of all handguns and all handgun ammunition except for the military, policemen, licensed security guards, licensed sporting clubs, and licensed gun collectors totally illegal."[15] In 1987 Shields said that he believed "in the right of law-abiding citizens to possess handguns... for legitimate purposes.".[16] In November 2008, Brady president Helmke, a former Republican mayor of Fort Wayne, Indiana, endorsed the American Hunters and Shooters Association saying, "I see our issues as complementary to theirs." He said, "The Brady Campaign is not just East Coast liberal Democrats."[17]...emphasis added
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brady_Campaign
Obviously a lot of time, effort and money has been spent in the attempt to ban classes of firearms. In some blue states there has been some success but little or nothing at the national level. The reason for that is the congressional representatives from gun friendly states realize pushing for a gun ban is political suicide as they will be voted out of office.
Now I will admit times change and possibly at some date in the future we may see the passage of federal gun laws similar to those in Great Britain or Australia. I seriously doubt that Congress will take the first step by creating a new Federal Assault Weapons Ban this year or even in the next decade.
In my opinion we can do a lot to stop gun violence and mass shootings by improving our existing gun laws and by better enforcing them. If we continue to do nothing these tragedies will continue to happen. Of course this approach will not totally eliminate all gun violence or mass shootings but it could result in far fewer incidents.
We should also be able to improve our background check system for firearms with ease. It should also be possible to improve and better enforce our existing laws against the straw purchase of firearms and the smuggling and sale of such weapons. Improving school security will largely be up to the individual states but the federal government can help provide money for such efforts. Obviously we do need a better mental healthcare system in our nation but that could be a contentious issue tied in with the effort to improve our existing healthcare system.
It seems more logical to push for the possible rather than the unachievable in order to actually save lives.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
94 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I dont have the energy to repeatedly point out to whoever what is going on here.
Eliot Rosewater
Mar 2018
#42
it will be a happy day when any of this passes congress and is signed by trump into law nt
msongs
Mar 2018
#3
Like I have been saying, the same groups that attacked Hillary are now after Dianne
Eliot Rosewater
Mar 2018
#7
That's you're perogative, but I think there is a lot in between AWB and do nothing
aikoaiko
Mar 2018
#43
You're a very long way away from 60 Senate votes willing to ban all semi-autos
aikoaiko
Mar 2018
#64
"Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness" is what is increased. Deaths reduce that right.
sharedvalues
Mar 2018
#71
How bout the rights of kids to attend school without being murderd down in a bloody heap
Wwcd
Mar 2018
#77
Like it or not she was basically responsible for putting the poison pill in the bill...
spin
Mar 2018
#30
Apparently RW talking points suddenly become facts when it comes to older female politicians.
ehrnst
Mar 2018
#34
A study on mass shootings after the assault weapon ban was lifted, observed that mass shootings
still_one
Mar 2018
#28
She is my Senator also, and I called bullshit on the statement blaming Feinstein on the lack of
still_one
Mar 2018
#38
In 1989 34 children and a teacher were shot and 5 children killed in Stockton, California, with a
still_one
Mar 2018
#49
Actually, it did have an effect on public safety, contrary to what you've heard from the NRA
ehrnst
Mar 2018
#33
Oh, so she "took all of the political momentum that could have resulted" in another bill
ehrnst
Mar 2018
#35
The right side of history. Let's all be on it. What's right: stopping American gun deaths.
sharedvalues
Mar 2018
#69