Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Always Right

(84 posts)
61. Citation appreciated
Sat Mar 3, 2018, 05:45 PM
Mar 2018

I appreciate you showing where you got your "evidence from.

However it doesn't actually show what you seem to think it shows.

The RAND CORPORATION didn't do a study or collect any facts of their own, instead it reviewed studies done by other groups.

From the link you sent...

"The studies that have been done often reach opposite conclusions to each other"

"RAND concluded that, first and foremost, far more research is necessary."

"its review does seem to point in a direction" ... "supports the idea that more guns lead to more gun deaths."


So basically a non-partisan group look at studies by other groups and came to the conclusion that the research is inconclusive and that more research is needed but the results point in a direction. Hardly conclusive proof of anything.

For all we know, 95 gun control groups did studies that showed gun control works and 5 gun rights groups did studies and showed that it doesn't work. Would it be proper to conclude that gun control is 95% effective? I don't think so.

What your link showed is that you can do a study to prove what ever you want to prove.

That is why the NRA has opposed using taxpayer money to fund the CDC because they want to call gun violence a disease and government groups only really want to prove is that that group needs more money to research the problem.

I would support any neutral outcome independent research, but the CDC certainly is not neutral or outcome independent and should not be funded with taxpayer money.

When a side with an agenda does research, you wind up with bogus "facts" like the number of school shootings because they include things which are not school shootings but count them as such.

The number of school shootings most often cited comes from Every Town for Gun Safety. The problem with their numbers is that when I think of a school shooting, I think that a crazy person goes on a shooting spree randomly killing people but their numbers include anytime a gun goes off on or near a school regardless of the circumstances. Recently it was pointed out that the list of school shootings included school shooting on January 3, 2018 at East Olive Elementary in St. Johns, Michigan where a man committed suicide in parking lot with nobody else injured. However it turns out that the school had shut down shut down more than six months earlier and was no longer a school but a vacant building. They have since deleted that one but there are plenty more examples of bogus school shootings.

For example, their list of school shootings includes an event on January 10, 2018 at Grayson College in Denison, Texas where the instructor at the at Criminal Justice Center was demonstrating a firearm simulator and when the instructor was removing their live weapon to be substituted with the training weapon, accidentally fired a shot. Nobody was injured. So what it was a school, albeit one that specifically required firearms, and an accident with no injuries, it remains on the list of "school shootings" just to puff up the statistics.

There are plenty of more examples of the group doing that so you can see why I don't put any faith in what amounts to a study done of other studies.

There is a god awful waste of humans in this country efhmc Feb 2018 #1
Tragic but keep an open mind NorenForSenateNY Feb 2018 #2
Yes! If the policeman only had a gun he would not have died! sharedvalues Feb 2018 #3
Yes. fleabiscuit Feb 2018 #4
thank the evil NRA and the weak thinking of their followers. demosincebirth Feb 2018 #6
Actually it looks more like there is no correlation: EX500rider Feb 2018 #22
Perhaps we should strive to compare the US to other modern economies. fleabiscuit Feb 2018 #23
Since the entire US homicide rate by any means is under 5.. EX500rider Feb 2018 #24
LOL fleabiscuit Feb 2018 #25
Perhaps you would like a state by state view? fleabiscuit Feb 2018 #26
which includes suicide by firearm, gejohnston Feb 2018 #30
Ya, that's not gun violence at all. fleabiscuit Feb 2018 #31
so the other half is rope violence? gejohnston Feb 2018 #32
I think I"m mostly agreeing with you. fleabiscuit Feb 2018 #33
Again, homicide and suicide are different things that will require different solutions. EX500rider Feb 2018 #34
Go with what makes you feel better. nt fleabiscuit Feb 2018 #35
Inflate the numbers if it makes you feel better. EX500rider Feb 2018 #41
If jumping off a bridge isn't bridge violence and hanging yourself isn't rope violence.. EX500rider Feb 2018 #42
WHO, nt fleabiscuit Feb 2018 #43
Love this chart. The NYT did it too. sharedvalues Feb 2018 #37
+1 nt Canoe52 Feb 2018 #11
If all guns were locked away in militia buildings as the Constitution suggests Eliot Rosewater Feb 2018 #16
If this was the original intent, can you provide examples where it was enforced? Marengo Feb 2018 #17
Got an Encylopedia Britanica handy? You'll have finished reading it before you get an answer... friendly_iconoclast Feb 2018 #18
Would you please show me what passage of the Constitution that is in? n/t oneshooter Feb 2018 #36
Yup. As they do in other countries. sharedvalues Feb 2018 #38
Which countries would that be? friendly_iconoclast Feb 2018 #45
As typical with that one, no answer when challenged... friendly_iconoclast Feb 2018 #46
I was held at gun point. My though wasn't 'why don't I have a pistol', but 'how did the 16yr old... marble falls Feb 2018 #20
Shouldn't police officers be on the forefront of gun control - and why aren't they? demosincebirth Feb 2018 #5
They often are but are not listen to. efhmc Feb 2018 #7
The rank-and-file tend to be very pro-2nd Amendment ... SeattleVet Feb 2018 #9
A small price to pay so a subset of Americans can have fun shooting up cans and signs. Kablooie Feb 2018 #8
The shooter was a 4 time felon who illegally had a gun. Hangingon Feb 2018 #15
If you familiarize yourself with the OP's, ahem, "body of work", a question naturally arises: friendly_iconoclast Feb 2018 #19
But they vote for the more gunnnnz people NCDem777 Feb 2018 #10
No. Bad apples need to be punished sharedvalues Feb 2018 #13
There's a few things I can agree with. n/t discntnt_irny_srcsm Feb 2018 #14
Nope. They brought this on themselves NCDem777 Feb 2018 #21
K & R SunSeeker Feb 2018 #12
Meanwhile they hold gun-raffles to push more guns into the population. DetlefK Feb 2018 #27
Some of them do. Many police are good people. sharedvalues Feb 2018 #39
Not just police lives. PoindexterOglethorpe Feb 2018 #28
Could this fact be one of the reasons why the federal government is pushing municipalities no_hypocrisy Feb 2018 #29
Yes that's exactly the justification given. If we banned handguns and semi-autos we could sharedvalues Feb 2018 #40
Ahem: Australian cops upgun: "(Victoria) Police set sights on faster reloading guns" friendly_iconoclast Feb 2018 #44
Hmmm, yagotme Feb 2018 #47
Your proof that we need more gun control is proof that gun control doesn't work. Always Right Mar 2018 #48
Fewer guns, fewer deaths. sharedvalues Mar 2018 #49
A label isn't an argument n/t discntnt_irny_srcsm Mar 2018 #50
...nor is rote recitation of simplistic platitudes and appeals to emotion friendly_iconoclast Mar 2018 #51
Proof here. NRA afraid of data. That's why they banned govt from collecting it. sharedvalues Mar 2018 #54
Proof here. NRA afraid of data; they know it will show gun control works. sharedvalues Mar 2018 #55
You need to tap the base of the turntable a few times, the record keeps skipping... friendly_iconoclast Mar 2018 #56
I'll let that comprehensive study speak for itself. n/m sharedvalues Mar 2018 #58
A lie isn't an argument discntnt_irny_srcsm Mar 2018 #57
I'll let that comprehensive study speak for itself abt effects of NRA fed funding ban. n/m sharedvalues Mar 2018 #59
You keep up talking about bans discntnt_irny_srcsm Mar 2018 #60
Proof that NRA/GOP is afraid of data; they know gun control works sharedvalues Mar 2018 #53
Citation appreciated Always Right Mar 2018 #61
Stop misrepresenting. RAND study shows GOP blocks fed research on guns. read my cite. nm sharedvalues Mar 2018 #62
You need to work on your reading comprehension Always Right Mar 2018 #63
Helen? Puha Ekapi_2 Mar 2018 #52
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Police lives are put at r...»Reply #61