Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
Showing Original Post only (View all)Thank you Diane Feinstein [View all]
Maybe some of you have seen the "This major new report on gun deaths should shock us all" post currently climbing up the Greatest Page:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2018/03/02/this-major-new-report-on-gun-deaths-should-shock-and-anger-us-all/?utm_term=.4119042fd01e
The new report from Rand reveals what a depraved dereliction of responsibility doing nothing yet again will really amount to. The report represents a serious effort to fill huge holes in our empirical knowledge about gun policy holes that are there by choice, in part because Congress has badly underfunded research and data collection on the topic. The Rand report undertook a comprehensive review of an enormous amount of recent studies on more than a dozen gun policies then whittled that down to around five dozen that passed its methodological standards, and summarized the conclusions.
The key findings, for purposes of the current debate, are as follows:
There is credible evidence that policies implementing background checks do reduce firearm homicides and suicides, and there is reason to believe expanding these checks would have a similar effect.
There is credible evidence that gun prohibitions associated with mental illness reduce firearm violence (though theres more limited evidence that they reduce firearm suicides).
There is more solid evidence that child-safety measures reduce unintentional injuries and deaths.
Rand did find that the evidence on the efficacy of other policies such as bans on assault-style weapons and raising the minimum age for purchases is inconclusive.
So, background checks work. Keeping crazy and violent people from having firearms works. Bans on guns because of their looks - not so much.
In other shocking news, water is wet, fire is hot, kittens are cute.
THANK YOU DIANE FEINSTEIN!
After Sandy Hook there was widespread bipartisan support for genuine and meaningful action on keeping bad people from having access to firearms.
Right now we could have a robust, secure, nationwide background check system in place, linked to reliable and timely information about whether or not a prospective purchaser (or transferee) was a prohibited person.
The political will was there - but NOOOOOoooooo! Diane Feinstein had to lard up the bill with her signature pet ideology BAN ASSAULT WEAPONS! Poof! There goes your bipartisan support and the bill fails.
How many lives have been lost because we don't have a universal and up to date background check system in place? Can you say Devin Patrick Kelley, Dylann Roof, Nikolas Cruz?
Most of us here know that despite what half of your Facebook feed is trying to convince you, assault weapons bans don't work. The 1994 ban did little more than cost Democrats in the mid-terms. The intensity and fervor of anti "assault weapon" memes suggests to me that an outside actor (Russia?) was primed and ready to take full advantage of the next gun tragedy and use it to give the Left every opportunity to shoot itself in the foot. I mean no disrespect to the Parkland students and their efforts, but their movement blew up really big and really fast - almost as if it was given a "push" by a foreign actor whose chief interests are not school safety and gun control but to blunt the momentum of the Democrats in November.
The Trump kleptocracy/kakistocracy/regime is the most dangerous, destructive, disaster to happen to the United States since the Civil War.
We need to focus on winning seats.
Background checks, reliable reporting on prohibited persons, closing the "gun show loophole" are winnable solutions.
Banning some of the most popular firearms because of their looks - is a losing proposition.
So thank you Diene Feinstein, for once again giving the Democrats a prime opportunity to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
94 replies, 16357 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (8)
ReplyReply to this post
94 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I dont have the energy to repeatedly point out to whoever what is going on here.
Eliot Rosewater
Mar 2018
#42
it will be a happy day when any of this passes congress and is signed by trump into law nt
msongs
Mar 2018
#3
Like I have been saying, the same groups that attacked Hillary are now after Dianne
Eliot Rosewater
Mar 2018
#7
That's you're perogative, but I think there is a lot in between AWB and do nothing
aikoaiko
Mar 2018
#43
You're a very long way away from 60 Senate votes willing to ban all semi-autos
aikoaiko
Mar 2018
#64
"Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness" is what is increased. Deaths reduce that right.
sharedvalues
Mar 2018
#71
How bout the rights of kids to attend school without being murderd down in a bloody heap
Wwcd
Mar 2018
#77
Like it or not she was basically responsible for putting the poison pill in the bill...
spin
Mar 2018
#30
Apparently RW talking points suddenly become facts when it comes to older female politicians.
ehrnst
Mar 2018
#34
A study on mass shootings after the assault weapon ban was lifted, observed that mass shootings
still_one
Mar 2018
#28
She is my Senator also, and I called bullshit on the statement blaming Feinstein on the lack of
still_one
Mar 2018
#38
In 1989 34 children and a teacher were shot and 5 children killed in Stockton, California, with a
still_one
Mar 2018
#49
Actually, it did have an effect on public safety, contrary to what you've heard from the NRA
ehrnst
Mar 2018
#33
Oh, so she "took all of the political momentum that could have resulted" in another bill
ehrnst
Mar 2018
#35
The right side of history. Let's all be on it. What's right: stopping American gun deaths.
sharedvalues
Mar 2018
#69