Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Gun Control & RKBA

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

needledriver

(836 posts)
Fri Mar 2, 2018, 01:39 PM Mar 2018

Thank you Diane Feinstein [View all]

Maybe some of you have seen the "This major new report on gun deaths should shock us all" post currently climbing up the Greatest Page:


https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2018/03/02/this-major-new-report-on-gun-deaths-should-shock-and-anger-us-all/?utm_term=.4119042fd01e

The new report from Rand reveals what a depraved dereliction of responsibility doing nothing yet again will really amount to. The report represents a serious effort to fill huge holes in our empirical knowledge about gun policy — holes that are there by choice, in part because Congress has badly underfunded research and data collection on the topic. The Rand report undertook a comprehensive review of an enormous amount of recent studies on more than a dozen gun policies — then whittled that down to around five dozen that passed its methodological standards, and summarized the conclusions.

The key findings, for purposes of the current debate, are as follows:

There is credible evidence that policies implementing background checks do reduce firearm homicides and suicides, and there is reason to believe expanding these checks would have a similar effect.

There is credible evidence that gun prohibitions associated with mental illness reduce firearm violence (though there’s more limited evidence that they reduce firearm suicides).

There is more solid evidence that child-safety measures reduce unintentional injuries and deaths.

Rand did find that the evidence on the efficacy of other policies — such as bans on assault-style weapons and raising the minimum age for purchases — is inconclusive.


So, background checks work. Keeping crazy and violent people from having firearms works. Bans on guns because of their looks - not so much.

In other shocking news, water is wet, fire is hot, kittens are cute.

THANK YOU DIANE FEINSTEIN!

After Sandy Hook there was widespread bipartisan support for genuine and meaningful action on keeping bad people from having access to firearms.

Right now we could have a robust, secure, nationwide background check system in place, linked to reliable and timely information about whether or not a prospective purchaser (or transferee) was a prohibited person.

The political will was there - but NOOOOOoooooo! Diane Feinstein had to lard up the bill with her signature pet ideology BAN ASSAULT WEAPONS! Poof! There goes your bipartisan support and the bill fails.

How many lives have been lost because we don't have a universal and up to date background check system in place? Can you say Devin Patrick Kelley, Dylann Roof, Nikolas Cruz?

Most of us here know that despite what half of your Facebook feed is trying to convince you, assault weapons bans don't work. The 1994 ban did little more than cost Democrats in the mid-terms. The intensity and fervor of anti "assault weapon" memes suggests to me that an outside actor (Russia?) was primed and ready to take full advantage of the next gun tragedy and use it to give the Left every opportunity to shoot itself in the foot. I mean no disrespect to the Parkland students and their efforts, but their movement blew up really big and really fast - almost as if it was given a "push" by a foreign actor whose chief interests are not school safety and gun control but to blunt the momentum of the Democrats in November.

The Trump kleptocracy/kakistocracy/regime is the most dangerous, destructive, disaster to happen to the United States since the Civil War.

We need to focus on winning seats.

Background checks, reliable reporting on prohibited persons, closing the "gun show loophole" are winnable solutions.

Banning some of the most popular firearms because of their looks - is a losing proposition.

So thank you Diene Feinstein, for once again giving the Democrats a prime opportunity to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.

94 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Thank you Diane Feinstein [View all] needledriver Mar 2018 OP
The fuck?! 50 Shades Of Blue Mar 2018 #1
They sneak in on us, don't they? shraby Mar 2018 #2
Why are these obvious anti Democratic posts allowed? Eliot Rosewater Mar 2018 #6
Needledriver brought a political hit job from a blog, Hortensis Mar 2018 #32
I dont have the energy to repeatedly point out to whoever what is going on here. Eliot Rosewater Mar 2018 #42
it will be a happy day when any of this passes congress and is signed by trump into law nt msongs Mar 2018 #3
Damn Her For Wanting To Get Rid Of The WEapons Me. Mar 2018 #4
Like I have been saying, the same groups that attacked Hillary are now after Dianne Eliot Rosewater Mar 2018 #7
You Betcha Me. Mar 2018 #17
The very same. Wwcd Mar 2018 #76
She did herself gibraltar72 Mar 2018 #81
But it wouldn't save lives aikoaiko Mar 2018 #40
Well Then, The Solution To All This Debate Me. Mar 2018 #41
That's you're perogative, but I think there is a lot in between AWB and do nothing aikoaiko Mar 2018 #43
Certainly Not Mine Me. Mar 2018 #45
Of course not. There are things that can be accomplished in the near future... spin Mar 2018 #91
This is the dumbest, dumbest, dumbest argument about guns. sharedvalues Mar 2018 #52
I'm not saying, "one gun law didn't work perfectly, we should give up" aikoaiko Mar 2018 #54
So ban all semi-autos. Not needed for hunting. sharedvalues Mar 2018 #61
You're a very long way away from 60 Senate votes willing to ban all semi-autos aikoaiko Mar 2018 #64
That's what my gay now-married friend said in 2006. sharedvalues Mar 2018 #68
The difference being that you're seeking to reduce civil liberties. aikoaiko Mar 2018 #70
"Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness" is what is increased. Deaths reduce that right. sharedvalues Mar 2018 #71
Civil liberties are things protected from govt interference. aikoaiko Mar 2018 #73
How bout the rights of kids to attend school without being murderd down in a bloody heap Wwcd Mar 2018 #77
Kids like all people have a right to not to be murdered. aikoaiko Mar 2018 #78
No one needs... discntnt_irny_srcsm Mar 2018 #79
re: "Let's all stand up on the right side." discntnt_irny_srcsm Mar 2018 #72
is this NRA Underground? samir.g Mar 2018 #5
No, this is the DU Gun Control and RKBA Group needledriver Mar 2018 #11
Welcome to DU. Enjoy your stay. aikoaiko Mar 2018 #44
It looks like you cut your bullet points off too soon. brer cat Mar 2018 #8
Thank you! needledriver Mar 2018 #10
Well, if you are so terrified brer cat Mar 2018 #12
Has yet to be established? needledriver Mar 2018 #14
When the 1994 Assault Weapons Ban became law a high percentage of .... spin Mar 2018 #29
+ 150 Me. Mar 2018 #18
Thank you (nt) ehrnst Mar 2018 #22
I don't think you understand how legislation and legislating works. George II Mar 2018 #9
Maybe I do, maybe I don't needledriver Mar 2018 #13
Oh. So, if it wasn't for Feinstein, things would be great. ehrnst Mar 2018 #15
If, after Sandy Hook needledriver Mar 2018 #16
635 Me. Mar 2018 #19
Amazing the power she has, isn't it? ehrnst Mar 2018 #21
Damn Me. Mar 2018 #25
Like it or not she was basically responsible for putting the poison pill in the bill... spin Mar 2018 #30
Well Then Let's Not Ever Try To Ban Those Guns Me. Mar 2018 #37
Gun control advocates have been trying to ban certain firearms for decades. ... spin Mar 2018 #55
The Possible Me. Mar 2018 #56
Here is a short list ... spin Mar 2018 #58
Nice Wish List Me. Mar 2018 #59
Lets suppose you have a car that doesnt start because it needs a new... spin Mar 2018 #82
Oh Stop Already Me. Mar 2018 #83
I am more interested in trying to save innocent lives if possible. ... spin Mar 2018 #84
And She Isn't? Me. Mar 2018 #85
I have no problem with her pushing for a new AWB in a separate bill. ... spin Mar 2018 #86
No Need To Be So Dismissive Me. Mar 2018 #87
It is called reality and sometimes reality sucks. ... spin Mar 2018 #88
OMG Me. Mar 2018 #89
This message was self-deleted by its author sl8 Mar 2018 #92
Oh, so it was all her doing. ehrnst Mar 2018 #20
Post removed Post removed Mar 2018 #23
Complete & Utter Nonsense Me. Mar 2018 #24
Why is it that only the women are utter failures ? sheshe2 Mar 2018 #26
Now There's A Question Women Have Waited Centuries Me. Mar 2018 #27
Apparently RW talking points suddenly become facts when it comes to older female politicians. ehrnst Mar 2018 #34
FEmale Politicians Me. Mar 2018 #93
A study on mass shootings after the assault weapon ban was lifted, observed that mass shootings still_one Mar 2018 #28
So what you are saying is that even with background checks needledriver Mar 2018 #31
She is my Senator also, and I called bullshit on the statement blaming Feinstein on the lack of still_one Mar 2018 #38
Needledriver DOES "single out Feinstein," many times Hortensis Mar 2018 #48
In 1989 34 children and a teacher were shot and 5 children killed in Stockton, California, with a still_one Mar 2018 #49
I'm sure Needledriver wouldn't lie about something Hortensis Mar 2018 #50
Actually, it did have an effect on public safety, contrary to what you've heard from the NRA ehrnst Mar 2018 #33
Universal Background Checks are the real deal discntnt_irny_srcsm Mar 2018 #39
I never said they didn't. I countered the argument that assault weapons bans ehrnst Mar 2018 #46
thank you, all weapon bans are even more effective... discntnt_irny_srcsm Mar 2018 #47
Oh, so she "took all of the political momentum that could have resulted" in another bill ehrnst Mar 2018 #35
"Needledriver?" Gosh, whatever could that mean? Squinch Mar 2018 #36
Feinstein is right on this issue. We need a ban on assault rifles. Sophia4 Mar 2018 #51
We need a ban on assault rifles. We should have a handgun ban too. sharedvalues Mar 2018 #53
And you just validated what the NRA has been claiming Always Right Mar 2018 #57
Same ban that UK, Canada, Aus has. sharedvalues Mar 2018 #60
You don't have the votes for that. AzureCrest Mar 2018 #62
That's what my gay now-married friend said about gay marriage in 2006. sharedvalues Mar 2018 #63
If you had the votes, the legislation would have been passed. AzureCrest Mar 2018 #65
Funny. That's ALSO what my gay now-married friend said in 2006 sharedvalues Mar 2018 #66
Uh huh. AzureCrest Mar 2018 #67
The right side of history. Let's all be on it. What's right: stopping American gun deaths. sharedvalues Mar 2018 #69
History says banning guns is not the right side. AzureCrest Mar 2018 #74
Post removed Post removed Mar 2018 #75
Thank you. K & R your post Wwcd Mar 2018 #80
+1 sharedvalues Mar 2018 #90
Agreed .... undercover_redneck Mar 2018 #94
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Thank you Diane Feinstein»Reply #0