REINSTATE THE ASSAULT WEAPONS BAN!

[AtheistCrusader]

174. You don't get to characterize it as 'jumping on' when the thread literally advertises itself in

the gungeon. That's the point of posting something, is it not? You just want to attach a negative connotation to people... responding to a thread.. that was posted for comment.


Yes, I said 'cool story bro'. It's an internet meme that says 'I don't believe you'. I don't believe that story for the reasons I already specified. Not knowing what you are talking about isn't a gender issue. My wife could have explained all the same things to you. Your gender is irrelevant to me. I made no assumptions about it. If you are female, and your account identifies you as such, that's nice, I didn't look at your profile. Untill you mentioned 'mansplaining', I was unaware. Now I'm aware, and I don't care. You're a voter. We are equals on this issue. (And mostly on the same side of the fence, despite our disagreement on specifics.)

If you don't like it when someone doesn't believe you, consider others don't like it when you don't acknowledge technical points, like the fact that a DIAS can't be installed successfully in a post-1968 AR-15 without extreme risk to the user, and likely malfunction. They are no longer compatible. Entire components that the DIAS relies upon are shaped differently, or missing entirely. You didn't even acknowledge that. I showed you what happens when there is a timing malfunction in the firing cycle of an AR. No acknowledgement. I pointed out that recent shooters haven't used auto sears. Not even the las vegas shithead that had enough money to actually buy a M-16 in a state where they are legal.

No acknowledgement. Consider that it is frustrating to another person, to talk to a wall.