Fewer guns mean fewer killings. We want a handgun ban.

[discntnt_irny_srcsm]

156. Possibly a case of reading comprehension

OU65802:

Less gun deaths only if we get them from people that shouldnt have them... Otherwise more death

sharedvalues:

You make two statements that are fallacies.
1. If we can’t get all guns we shouldn’t try. Of course not. Any little bit helps.

Nowhere in the reply by OU65802 was it stated, "If we can’t get all guns we shouldn’t try."

sharedvalues:

On gun numbers. Fewer guns means fewer seatha period.

Without a link to some proof, this is an assertion. (I could be wrong but I inferred that "seatha" should be deaths.)

sharedvalues:

The best data we have shows this.

Again, no link.
sharedvalues:

The gun industry had banned govt from collecting more data while they argue this point — that’s clear evidence they know they are wrong.

Possibly you have either a link to show that the gun industry is in charge of the CDC or that there is a law about a data collection prohibition. Once again, provide a link to support some of these claims.


Now, correct me if I am wrong but I infer, since you say OU65802 is wrong, that it is of no importance which guns are confiscated first. Correct what he/she wrote with your belief.