Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: Fewer guns mean fewer killings. We want a handgun ban. [View all]The Polack MSgt
(13,425 posts)Workable. Ugly gun laws - laws that ban weapons because of cosmetic factors such as polymer rather than wood furniture or pistol grips - those are nonsense
Magazine capacity restrictions are an issue where we can argue. Perhaps low capacity mags could hinder mass shooters, maybe.
I will point out that the Vegas shooter had so many rifles that his reloading time with high versus low capacity magazines seems moot. With a dozen loaded rifles on hand he would still pump out a lot of rounds before having to reload any of them. It may help in other situations though, I believe that is an area where compromise is possible
I have several issues with conflating gun rights with hunting though.
The vast majority of gun owners do not hunt.
Defending hunter's rights exclusively will put two thirds of gun owners on alert that they are not protected - and that means the "DEMS ARE COMING FOR OUR GUNS!!!!!" propaganda will find a ready audience
ETA: Bump stocks need to go. I am in favor of maintaining the heavy restrictions already in place regarding automatic weapons and bump fire stocks circumvent those statutes