Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

yagotme

(3,819 posts)
7. Are you proposing the "slippery slope" method?
Wed Nov 1, 2017, 10:29 AM
Nov 2017

"Therefore gun control advocates who wish to ban semiautomatic firearms try to use the incremental approach. First ban rifles like the AR-15 and then ban and confiscate other rifles that use a detachable magazine that holds more than five rounds. Once that is accomplished work on banning and confiscating all semiautomatic pistols."

Pro-gunners would see this as the beginning of complete confiscation, like some of those here proposing an outright ban on firearms. The '94 AWB attempted to address a lot of this, but manufacturers simply looked at the law, removed the "banned" items from the firearms, and kept cranking them out. There is no way you will get 51% of the country on board with such legislation if the word "confiscate" appears in the legislation. The "taking" of personal property will be severely frowned upon, on a nationwide basis.

The part about "use a detachable magazine" won't fly well, either. Just the way to ban a bolt action hunting rifle with a detachable mag, is to make a mag that holds 6 rounds. Words mean things, and hastily/poorly worded legislation will end up in the SC, and you know what will happen there.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»A Canadian take on the su...»Reply #7