Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: A different way of defining what an assault weapon is [View all]Always Right
(84 posts)10. Your definition of AW is too broad and at the same time over inclusive
Using your definition of AW, it would be easy enough to get around by changing the dimensions of the ammo or even using rimmed ammo and a few other ways I can think of to avoid being an AW.
Also, your definition of semi-automatic would include revolvers.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
48 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Simpler: Any semiauto centerfire rifle or brace-equipped-pistol capable of accepting detachable mags
JoeStuckInOH
Oct 2017
#4
Same way Machine Guns can be Short barreled rifles without dual registration.
JoeStuckInOH
Oct 2017
#12
My definition (or post content) suggests banning nothing. It's just a definition.
JoeStuckInOH
Oct 2017
#21
Most every term in relation to guns is well understood except for assault weapons
Kaleva
Oct 2017
#31
Have you considered why that term is misunderstood and ill-defined?
discntnt_irny_srcsm
Oct 2017
#33
re: "Wouldn't it make sense to adapt a definition that addresses your main complaint...
discntnt_irny_srcsm
Oct 2017
#37
"Simple, short, easy." And impossible. But by all means try for your 'Prohibition 3.0'
friendly_iconoclast
Nov 2017
#44