Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: Pasco theater shooting case heads to 'stand your ground' hearing [View all]discntnt_irny_srcsm
(18,577 posts)31. I'm not seeing how you've answered whether you accept as being okay...
...an individual bringing his own gun(s) to the home or property of another, with the owner's permission, for purposes other than hunting.
You say that the "need" to carry is small. Surely you don't suggest that all areas, cities and towns have relatively identical factors of risk and danger. What basis do you have for such an assessment?
Would you be suggesting that say the Cherry Hill area of Baltimore is equivalent to Cherry Hill, NJ?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
39 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I don't hold the evasiveness *too* much against you- it's entirely understandable
friendly_iconoclast
Feb 2017
#11
Supreme Court decisions can change depending on the compositon of the SCOTUS.
guillaumeb
Feb 2017
#13
I'm not seeing how you've answered whether you accept as being okay...
discntnt_irny_srcsm
Feb 2017
#31
The avoidance of awkward questions has been both assiduous and obvious
friendly_iconoclast
Feb 2017
#32
When an atheist shouts AMEN!........you KNOW that they agree wholeheartedly.
pablo_marmol
Feb 2017
#37