Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: Rio 2016: top American Olympic shooter Kim Rhode attacks gun control laws [View all]beevul
(12,194 posts)36. Right. Sure they are...
The gun-control advocates are simply responding to th gun lobby which will allow no discussion of any gun control measures at all.
Right. Sure they are.
This is a typical misrepresentation leveled by those who push for more and more restrictions but can never come out and say how much gun control will be enough. The assertion is issued as if there is no gun control at all, with the deliberate unspoken implication being exactly that.
I have no problem with the control advocates passing extreme restrictions on guns and ammo.
Of course you don't - you're one of them.
Doing so may serve to move the NRA et al off their "nothing or nothing" position.
This is yet another of the typical misrepresentations leveled at pro-gun posters. Spoken as if the nra is against ALL gun laws, which is historically, hilariously, demonstrably, a fantasy.
It does however, betray the reality of the anti-gun position:
"Any gun law previously passed counts as nothing, and for purposes of discussion does not exist unless under direct threat of repeal, in which case it will be characterized as the most important gun control in the world until the threat has passed. Individuals and groups offering so much as the slightest resistance to what we the gun control activists want right now, shall be characterized as 'against all gun control', 'extremists', 'absolutists' etc."
I'll take that trade off it results in a few lives being saved.
Trade offs are always easy when you're bartering with someone elses currency.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
55 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Rio 2016: top American Olympic shooter Kim Rhode attacks gun control laws [View all]
appal_jack
Aug 2016
OP
The gun-control extremists wreck any opportunity at reasonable measures like UBCs...
Eleanors38
Aug 2016
#26
If you read about the history of gun-control, the extremist controllers set the tone...
Eleanors38
Aug 2016
#30
It's the extreme restricions that make RKBA advocates so distrustful of gun control.
Nuclear Unicorn
Aug 2016
#40
Or consider Mexico, only 1 gun store in the whole country, total gun control very safe there
DonP
Aug 2016
#18
But Brazil isn't industrialized enough to have them counted as having a higher...
discntnt_irny_srcsm
Aug 2016
#19
Reuters is virulently anti-gun. THAT'S the reason she expected "gun control" to be more important
Eleanors38
Aug 2016
#24
No, but gratuitous mention of dead children is. It's known as 'appealing to emotion' or Lovejoying:
friendly_iconoclast
Aug 2016
#39
You 'rested your case' by using logical fallacies? Shades of 'Hitchen's razor':
friendly_iconoclast
Aug 2016
#46
"I'm not interested in debating this crap with you any further..........."
pablo_marmol
Aug 2016
#54
"(T)he NRA pays better." They do? And how did you come to know this?
friendly_iconoclast
Aug 2016
#38
So, no evidence. Did you perchance attend the College of It Stands to Reason?:
friendly_iconoclast
Aug 2016
#44