Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
Showing Original Post only (View all)Rio 2016: top American Olympic shooter Kim Rhode attacks gun control laws [View all]
Americas top Olympic shooter, Kim Rhode, took a strong stand against gun control laws, offering full support for carrying concealed weapons and attacking gun legislation in her home state of California.
Im definitely becoming more vocal because I see the need, said Rhode, a skeet shooter going for a medal in her sixth straight Olympics. We just had six laws that were passed in California that will directly affect me. For example, one of them being an ammunition law. I shoot 500 to 1,000 rounds a day, having to do a background check every time I purchase ammo or when I bring ammo out for a competition or a match those are very, very challenging for me.
Rhode is referring to a new set of gun control measures, one of which requires a background check for ammunition purchases, in the same way that background checks are required for guns in the state but there doesnt appear to be any limit on the amount of ammunition that can be purchased at once. Nor does there appear to be any requirement for a background check when ammunition is brought to a competition or match, according to the Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence.
(snip)
She expected her press conferences to be more about gun control than her performance and spends time studying proposed anti-gun laws before big shooting events.
She added that the stigma that has been attached to shooting has affected her ability to get endorsements, saying that at least one large company refused to sponsor her.
She also wondered why comparable Olympic stars are not put under the same scrutiny as shooters. For instance, she said, why are swimmers not interrogated in interviews after a publicized drowning accident?
Source: https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2016/aug/05/rio2016-top-american-olympic-shooter-kim-rhode-attacks-gun-control-laws
Nice to see a top-performing Olympian speaking-up on behalf of Second Amendment rights.
-app
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
55 replies, 9709 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
55 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Rio 2016: top American Olympic shooter Kim Rhode attacks gun control laws [View all]
appal_jack
Aug 2016
OP
The gun-control extremists wreck any opportunity at reasonable measures like UBCs...
Eleanors38
Aug 2016
#26
If you read about the history of gun-control, the extremist controllers set the tone...
Eleanors38
Aug 2016
#30
It's the extreme restricions that make RKBA advocates so distrustful of gun control.
Nuclear Unicorn
Aug 2016
#40
Or consider Mexico, only 1 gun store in the whole country, total gun control very safe there
DonP
Aug 2016
#18
But Brazil isn't industrialized enough to have them counted as having a higher...
discntnt_irny_srcsm
Aug 2016
#19
Reuters is virulently anti-gun. THAT'S the reason she expected "gun control" to be more important
Eleanors38
Aug 2016
#24
No, but gratuitous mention of dead children is. It's known as 'appealing to emotion' or Lovejoying:
friendly_iconoclast
Aug 2016
#39
You 'rested your case' by using logical fallacies? Shades of 'Hitchen's razor':
friendly_iconoclast
Aug 2016
#46
"I'm not interested in debating this crap with you any further..........."
pablo_marmol
Aug 2016
#54
"(T)he NRA pays better." They do? And how did you come to know this?
friendly_iconoclast
Aug 2016
#38
So, no evidence. Did you perchance attend the College of It Stands to Reason?:
friendly_iconoclast
Aug 2016
#44