Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: Tipping point. [View all]gejohnston
(17,502 posts)16. critical thinking hint,
why are people who aren't trained in statistics or criminology doing studies that require those skills, and publishing them in unrelated publications?
I would like to see the study be peer reviewed by those who are.
If you read the long discredited Kellerman study, which this cites twice, it said drinking alcohol, smoking pot, renting, and living in a poor neighborhood are higher risk factors than guns.
All it really says is that if you own a gun, you are more likely to use it instead of a rope to off yourself. It doesn't say that you won't off yourself.
These models were adjusted for demographic characteristics but not psychological and behavioral characteristics of the decedent because there were no significant differences between those who used a firearm and those who used some other means in terms of their psychological or behavioral characteristics. These models were also adjusted for significant interaction terms, where applicable.
What the "study" says is that if you own a gun and are suicidal, you are more likely to use it instead of a rope. What it doesn't say is that you are less likely to off yourself.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
43 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Great! How about liability on the part of any gun owner whose weapon is used to harm others?
Human101948
Jun 2016
#1
How about liability for the police and their employers who lose guns that are then used in crimes?
Human101948
Jun 2016
#2
Hard fact, if you have a gun in the home you are more likely to die a violent death...
Human101948
Jun 2016
#13
Straw colossus. Few in the pro-2A group here buy into Lott's theory. Note CDC findings.
Eleanors38
Jul 2016
#32
If you are in a home equipped with electricity, you are more likely to be electrocuted.
Eleanors38
Jul 2016
#27
"This is readly assisted by a Democratic Party which has junked any FDR/LBJ pretenses......"
pablo_marmol
Jul 2016
#38
If I can avoid a "hide," the Party pretty much gave up on a sound ideology for change...
Eleanors38
Jul 2016
#41
Great idea. Strip citizens of the right to self-defense - pay any consequences.
pablo_marmol
Jul 2016
#39
I appreciate this post, as it strongly suggest a larger issue than gun control...
Eleanors38
Jul 2016
#42