Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Gun Control & RKBA

In reply to the discussion: Tipping point. [View all]
 

Human101948

(3,457 posts)
13. Hard fact, if you have a gun in the home you are more likely to die a violent death...
Thu Jun 30, 2016, 02:36 PM
Jun 2016
Data from a US mortality follow-back survey were analyzed to determine whether having a firearm in the home increases the risk of a violent death in the home and whether risk varies by storage practice, type of gun, or number of guns in the home. Those persons with guns in the home were at greater risk than those without guns in the home of dying from a homicide in the home (adjusted odds ratio = 1.9, 95% confidence interval: 1.1, 3.4). They were also at greater risk of dying from a firearm homicide, but risk varied by age and whether the person was living with others at the time of death. The risk of dying from a suicide in the home was greater for males in homes with guns than for males without guns in the home (adjusted odds ratio = 10.4, 95% confidence interval: 5.8, 18.9). Persons with guns in the home were also more likely to have died from suicide committed with a firearm than from one committed by using a different method (adjusted odds ratio = 31.1, 95% confidence interval: 19.5, 49.6). Results show that regardless of storage practice, type of gun, or number of firearms in the home, having a gun in the home was associated with an increased risk of firearm homicide and firearm suicide in the home.
http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/content/160/10/929.full
Tipping point. [View all] mog75 Jun 2016 OP
Great! How about liability on the part of any gun owner whose weapon is used to harm others? Human101948 Jun 2016 #1
How about liability for the police and their employers who lose guns that are then used in crimes? Human101948 Jun 2016 #2
There is already liability for using a firearm to illegaly harm others. oneshooter Jun 2016 #3
yeah, yeah, what about the thousands of owners who don't lock up their guns Human101948 Jun 2016 #6
If they are not locked up, and then stolen and used illegaly oneshooter Jun 2016 #20
A car is not a gun... Human101948 Jun 2016 #22
So you are claimimg that a car can not be used to injure or kill? n/t oneshooter Jun 2016 #23
A car is not designed for the sole purpose of killing. A gun is. Katashi_itto Jul 2016 #26
If they are designed for transportation only oneshooter Jul 2016 #28
preconceptions & prejudice >> logic and/or facts n/t discntnt_irny_srcsm Jul 2016 #29
If someone harms another who is not an attacker, I would prefer jail. Eleanors38 Jun 2016 #5
Worst thing about gun-free zones is the advertising. Sheesh. Eleanors38 Jun 2016 #4
The gun free zone is a gun nut myth... Human101948 Jun 2016 #7
Oh yeah, and there was an armed guard at the Orlando shooting... Human101948 Jun 2016 #8
bullshit gejohnston Jun 2016 #9
You protestations are duly noted... Human101948 Jun 2016 #10
yes, but I provided a source not tied to any ideology gejohnston Jun 2016 #12
Your source is a fountain of gun propaganda.. Human101948 Jun 2016 #14
no body armor in that specific case gejohnston Jun 2016 #15
Hard fact, Human: More guns in circulation, murder rates are down. Eleanors38 Jun 2016 #11
Hard fact, if you have a gun in the home you are more likely to die a violent death... Human101948 Jun 2016 #13
critical thinking hint, gejohnston Jun 2016 #16
You won't like this one as well! Human101948 Jun 2016 #17
there are three outlooks in criminology circles gejohnston Jun 2016 #18
Straw colossus. Few in the pro-2A group here buy into Lott's theory. Note CDC findings. Eleanors38 Jul 2016 #32
Here's the thing about correlation ... Straw Man Jul 2016 #33
If you are in a home equipped with electricity, you are more likely to be electrocuted. Eleanors38 Jul 2016 #27
back on topic mog75 Jun 2016 #19
No, not even close DonP Jun 2016 #21
Did you read the article? Kang Colby Jul 2016 #34
Sorry, after two weeks of getting the crap kicked out of me I missed that DonP Jul 2016 #36
You were probably doing a lot of the kicking. Kang Colby Jul 2016 #37
This message was self-deleted by its author pablo_marmol Jul 2016 #25
"harshes my vibe." Heh-Heh. Eleanors38 Jul 2016 #31
No. But the issue will persist as it is culture war by proxy... Eleanors38 Jul 2016 #30
"This is readly assisted by a Democratic Party which has junked any FDR/LBJ pretenses......" pablo_marmol Jul 2016 #38
If I can avoid a "hide," the Party pretty much gave up on a sound ideology for change... Eleanors38 Jul 2016 #41
**Very** well said, E38. pablo_marmol Jul 2016 #43
Yup, it's a tipping point alright... Puha Ekapi Jun 2016 #24
This is clearly the tipping point. Kang Colby Jul 2016 #35
Great idea. Strip citizens of the right to self-defense - pay any consequences. pablo_marmol Jul 2016 #39
I hope you're right...self defense should be #1 priority. ileus Jul 2016 #40
I appreciate this post, as it strongly suggest a larger issue than gun control... Eleanors38 Jul 2016 #42
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Tipping point.»Reply #13