Gun Control & RKBA

The Green Manalishi

(1,054 posts)

4. I think that's about right

Tue Jun 21, 2016, 09:27 AM

Jun 2016

I'm strongly pro RKBA myself, but no matter how much I might disagree with some Democratic politicians on this issue I should get the boot if I attack them personally. The same thing with other DU members; I might be angered, frightened or insulted by their opinions, but I've no right to cast aspersions on their character, nor they on mine, period, end of subject and boot in ass to anyone who can't get behind that, be they the most strident prohibitionist or ardent RKBA enthusiast.

My .02

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

50 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

"No divisive group attacks" Hmmm, wonder if it applies to Democrat Gun owners on DU? [View all] DonP Jun 2016 OP

or pit bull vs nopit bulls hollysmom Jun 2016 #1

So gun grabber would be right out Buzz cook Jun 2016 #2

I think that's about right The Green Manalishi Jun 2016 #4

Excellent question, Don -- this will be interesting to follow. pablo_marmol Jun 2016 #3

I could be wrong but ..... DonP Jun 2016 #5

I could name several who really should be carefull of what they say. n/t oneshooter Jun 2016 #6

My guess, they still figure on the jury system to cover their ass DonP Jun 2016 #7

I expect little change. nt Eleanors38 Jun 2016 #10

Turns out, your expectations have been met: friendly_iconoclast Jun 2016 #14

Change the rules all you want, but there is always special dispensation in DU. Eleanors38 Jun 2016 #16

2A progressives along with believers will always be fair game. ileus Jun 2016 #8

We shall see how it goes Duckhunter935 Jun 2016 #9

I had a post, I made here, hidden for using the word "grabber" Press Virginia Jun 2016 #11

As does "ammosexual" n/t oneshooter Jun 2016 #12

It will ALL be back, sticky floors and all. Eleanors38 Jun 2016 #17

"Assault penis" Puha Ekapi Jun 2016 #20

Of course not- read the linked OP and comments- but not if you have high blood pressure: friendly_iconoclast Jun 2016 #13

I alerted on an attack directed at me Duckhunter935 Jun 2016 #15

There's not much point in alerting. Straw Man Jun 2016 #18

I've noticed a lot of "selective enforcement" RME_SFC Jun 2016 #19

Nope, business as usual sarisataka Jul 2016 #21

Skinner still refuses to answer Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #22

There is a very sarisataka Jul 2016 #24

Yes, it is interesting Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #25

Agreed. But, it is a clear sign of their ongoing impotence DonP Jul 2016 #23

I saw that Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #27

There are those of us who are gun owners Eko Jul 2016 #26

What type(s) of firearm do you own, and why? Marengo Jul 2016 #31

A Pistol. Eko Jul 2016 #32

Did you have a background check performed? Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #33

On what? Eko Jul 2016 #35

That firearms transfer Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #37

Why would I do that? Eko Jul 2016 #40

Well it would probably be mandatory Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #41

Interesting. Eko Jul 2016 #42

Universal Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #43

Most people Eko Jul 2016 #44

Yep, I tend to agree Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #45

So Eko Jul 2016 #46

Never tried to set you up Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #47

Ok. Eko Jul 2016 #48

Democratic gun owners - many are here and have been for over a decade blm Jul 2016 #28

Just hard to decide where that "common sense" line is for many people DonP Jul 2016 #29

Let me know when you find out Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #38

No, it does not. n/t oneshooter Jul 2016 #30

Such capriciousness shows they cannot be trusted to justly administer the laws they demand. Nuclear Unicorn Jul 2016 #34

"Vindictive and cruel" is a component of gun control... beevul Jul 2016 #36

No, of course not Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #39

May I ask a question? Kang Colby Jul 2016 #49

But....but....but......... pablo_marmol Jul 2016 #50