Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: A well regulated militia? [View all]Ghost in the Machine
(14,912 posts)38. I think you are confused about who "the PEOPLE" are...
Back during that time, a LOT of "the People" relied on firearms to feed their families, and for protection while they were still "discovering" this new land that they "found". I, personally, don't think that the fledgling new Government would disallow "the People" the right to eat and/or defend themselves while "settling and/or pioneering". If so, I would think the amendment would read "....the right of the 'members of the Militia' to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed".
As for the time frame on getting ratified, yes it took some time to first make sure that we WON our freedom, then had to get a Government set up to read, ratify and pass or deny any laws and rights.
I can agree with this:
Disarmed states militias, or ones that were not well-regulated, would greatly reduce the effectiveness of the Militia system, the recourse being a greater need of a large standing army, and so a greater threat to our liberties.
... though I will politely agree to disagree with you on some other points.
Peace,
Ghost
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
47 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Too many people misinterpret the 2nd Amendment *because* of the "well regulated militia" term...
Ghost in the Machine
Mar 2016
#17
No, your point was to try to lump all gun owners into a "militia", which is a false analogy. n/t
Ghost in the Machine
Mar 2016
#20
Here's a bit, when Congress was actually discussing the article that became the 2nd amendment...
jmg257
Mar 2016
#41
The Militia was formed from the body of the people, so yes - the people had their rights
jmg257
Mar 2016
#39
You seem to confuse the militia with the individuals who may nor may not be in it.
ManiacJoe
Mar 2016
#19
Cartoons, the last resort of a poster who has nothing original of their own to say.
Lurks Often
Mar 2016
#26
Amazing how this "art/journalism" form has remained so static in this day and age. nt
Eleanors38
Apr 2016
#44
Members of a Christian militia accused of plotting an antigovernment uprising were acquitted...
discntnt_irny_srcsm
Mar 2016
#27