Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Gun Control & RKBA

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
Tue Jan 12, 2016, 10:03 AM Jan 2016

I keep seeing the taunt, "Obama hasn't taken away your guns" being offered by people [View all]

who continually laud "Melt them down" threads and/or cite Australian/UK gun control models as the way forward for American gun control laws.

In other words, they want guns taken away but then semi-triumphantly claim that no one has taken guns away.

Considering the President's recent EA actually liberalizes access to weapons regulated by the NFA I would be inclined to think those offering the taunt would be upset with the President rather than using his actions as a basis for a taunt.

Can anyone offer an explanation for this seeming inconsistency?

108 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
For them "Rhetoric > Reality" discntnt_irny_srcsm Jan 2016 #1
I would offer a more radical solution to the proliferation of weapons randr Jan 2016 #2
How much money does the NRA make from gun sales and how much would they lose Nuclear Unicorn Jan 2016 #3
Since the majority of NRA Board members have economic interest in weapons factories randr Jan 2016 #4
Even without any special law... discntnt_irny_srcsm Jan 2016 #5
"...without explicit participation" zipplewrath Jan 2016 #7
There's no duty to spy on potential customers and we do not want one. Nuclear Unicorn Jan 2016 #8
But one cannot actively participate either zipplewrath Jan 2016 #10
How do you determine if someone is going to illegally use a gun and if it is discernible Nuclear Unicorn Jan 2016 #11
More of a case of a continuing activity zipplewrath Jan 2016 #14
re: criminal intent purchases discntnt_irny_srcsm Jan 2016 #13
Aligning data zipplewrath Jan 2016 #15
For ammo and guns... discntnt_irny_srcsm Jan 2016 #19
By the manufacturer? zipplewrath Jan 2016 #20
The two cases discntnt_irny_srcsm Jan 2016 #21
Sales data zipplewrath Jan 2016 #23
Just some simple questions discntnt_irny_srcsm Jan 2016 #27
Oh, no zipplewrath Jan 2016 #29
They should speak to the ATF about that discntnt_irny_srcsm Jan 2016 #32
Big Data. So that is the fate in store for the Fifth Amendment. Eleanors38 Jan 2016 #48
Why worry? The Fourth Amendment has already been nullified... Human101948 Jan 2016 #76
The WOD took out the 4th; the 5th -- any Tom, Dick or Harry with a watch List? Eleanors38 Jan 2016 #95
Bars are held accountable for accidents caused by people they have over served randr Jan 2016 #24
extreme cases zipplewrath Jan 2016 #25
I know a few bar owners who take this very seriously randr Jan 2016 #28
It's be hard not to zipplewrath Jan 2016 #30
Like car manufacturers were held accountable for injures before seat belts? randr Jan 2016 #22
??? discntnt_irny_srcsm Jan 2016 #34
Gun manufacturers are still liable for defective products. Nuclear Unicorn Jan 2016 #6
Rather than liability resting with the manufacturers, guillaumeb Jan 2016 #31
We've been through this many times before. Insurance doesn't work the way you believe, branford Jan 2016 #35
Let us get to the point: guillaumeb Jan 2016 #37
Did you even read my whole post? branford Jan 2016 #39
You still don't understand how insurance works. ManiacJoe Jan 2016 #40
There were two posts with such very rare accidents today. guillaumeb Jan 2016 #41
You are getting there. ManiacJoe Jan 2016 #42
Might we be approaching "there"? guillaumeb Jan 2016 #43
The first step to finding a solution ManiacJoe Jan 2016 #44
another issue with insurance discntnt_irny_srcsm Jan 2016 #45
Frankly, I would take that supposed 34% of US population has guns with a HUGE grain of salt Big_Mike Jan 2016 #36
Or you want that percentage to be much higher to justify your feelings guillaumeb Jan 2016 #38
Human nature (and my nature especially) could go that way. We rationalize Big_Mike Jan 2016 #46
Or you want that percentage to be much be much lower to justify your feelings as normal. Nuclear Unicorn Jan 2016 #47
It could be, just as well as the other. Big_Mike Jan 2016 #65
Your comparing two groups zipplewrath Jan 2016 #9
My post merely mentions the administration because of the claims made by advocates. Nuclear Unicorn Jan 2016 #12
And the advocates are right zipplewrath Jan 2016 #16
Your posts are all over the place. This is too tedious to care about. Nuclear Unicorn Jan 2016 #17
A failure to communicate takes two zipplewrath Jan 2016 #18
"Advocates..." Beyond a declining MSM, who are they? Eleanors38 Jan 2016 #50
In 45 years? zipplewrath Jan 2016 #53
Very reasoned and I hope true. randr Jan 2016 #26
While we're talking...... discntnt_irny_srcsm Jan 2016 #33
Remember, 2 - 3 generations zipplewrath Jan 2016 #49
Maybe you've been a bit sheltered discntnt_irny_srcsm Jan 2016 #51
Which part of the demographics do you dispute? zipplewrath Jan 2016 #52
The issues you mention discntnt_irny_srcsm Jan 2016 #55
Based upon what? zipplewrath Jan 2016 #56
I acknowledged an influx of people... discntnt_irny_srcsm Jan 2016 #58
Over time zipplewrath Jan 2016 #62
I would take surveys with a grain of salt discntnt_irny_srcsm Jan 2016 #63
We're talking decades zipplewrath Jan 2016 #66
I think my skepticism points out the possibility... discntnt_irny_srcsm Jan 2016 #68
And you have evidence of this counter trend. zipplewrath Jan 2016 #71
That is about the only poll that shows a decline gejohnston Jan 2016 #64
So you have data to back this up zipplewrath Jan 2016 #67
you have a flawed survey gejohnston Jan 2016 #69
Derivative zipplewrath Jan 2016 #70
No one wants guns from law-abiding citizens. The end. nt silvershadow Jan 2016 #54
You would be very mistaken -- Nuclear Unicorn Jan 2016 #57
and that's just on this site. discntnt_irny_srcsm Jan 2016 #59
I don't know whether to be amused or insulted that they still Nuclear Unicorn Jan 2016 #60
And they can't image why there's push back discntnt_irny_srcsm Jan 2016 #61
But, but, but ... it's just "Common Sense" DonP Jan 2016 #72
Ammosexual paranoia is not negated by my own personal support for Austrailian style arms control. stone space Jan 2016 #73
So the thing RKBA supporters say you want to do you admit you want to do. Nuclear Unicorn Jan 2016 #74
Have I ever claimed to be pro-Tiger Attack Helicpopter? stone space Jan 2016 #75
Why do you want to use an attack helicopter on people? DonP Jan 2016 #77
Reading is Fundamental. stone space Jan 2016 #78
You brought up using an attack helicopter DonP Jan 2016 #82
Aparently, you haven't watched the video. (nt) stone space Jan 2016 #83
Why are you fixated on death spewers like an attack helicopter? DonP Jan 2016 #84
You are behaving strangely, now. stone space Jan 2016 #85
Good news, I read that Iowa is allowing carry on campus DonP Jan 2016 #86
That's creepy. stone space Jan 2016 #87
Ah, the family album DonP Jan 2016 #90
My father died when I was a child, and my brother died many years ago. stone space Jan 2016 #93
Oh, so you want to attack others... beevul Jan 2016 #96
Whose brother did I attack? Whose father? What did my dead father and brother do to you? stone space Jan 2016 #97
Did someone say you did? beevul Jan 2016 #99
I was responding to your comment. Why should I take it up with others. stone space Jan 2016 #100
Which comment, cite please. N/T beevul Jan 2016 #101
Your results. Cassiopeia Jan 2016 #94
good technique. beergood Jan 2016 #108
If such nonsense is all you have left. Nuclear Unicorn Jan 2016 #79
Does this mean that you have no answer? stone space Jan 2016 #80
You offered a lame straw man about helicopters I gave it the attention it merited. Nuclear Unicorn Jan 2016 #81
Another thread-jacking of no relevance whatever discntnt_irny_srcsm Jan 2016 #88
At least they're consistent. beevul Jan 2016 #89
Meh, that's nothing, GGJohn Jan 2016 #91
Militant Pacifists have disarmed more fearsome weapons than that. Never underestimate Nonviolence. stone space Jan 2016 #92
Lets test that... beevul Jan 2016 #98
What is the lesson? stone space Jan 2016 #102
That militant pacifism is useless... beevul Jan 2016 #103
You haven't demonstrated your point. (nt) stone space Jan 2016 #104
He has, you simply didn't get it: Militant pacifism only works against those with a conscience friendly_iconoclast Jan 2016 #105
I read an article once that pointed that out graphically DonP Jan 2016 #107
That merely indicates that the point can be easily demonstrated... beevul Jan 2016 #106
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»I keep seeing the taunt, ...»Reply #0