Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: What if instead of a gun-owner-registry, there were a national gun-registry? [View all]safeinOhio
(34,113 posts)34. Apparently they do when
buying machine guns. But then those are taxed and registered. Of course traffickers care, at least enough to purchase them in states with lax laws and take them to criminals in other states to make a profit. That would, at least, reduce the number of illegal guns on the streets.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
110 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
What if instead of a gun-owner-registry, there were a national gun-registry? [View all]
DetlefK
Jan 2016
OP
Which has squat to do with them opposing registration due to privacy concerns. eom.
GGJohn
Jan 2016
#87
That's because all land is purchased in a legal deed concept called "Fee Simple".
NutmegYankee
Jan 2016
#83
But acts of gun violence are exceedingly rare compared to the number guns and gun owners
hack89
Jan 2016
#62
So the Feds ignore heroin, cocaine and meth but will come down hard because of automatic weapons?
hack89
Jan 2016
#68
Why can't the Feds come down hard on the cartels and drug gangs using semi-automatic weapons?
hack89
Jan 2016
#69
My post was in response to your comments regarding Adam Lanza & Nancy Lanza ONLY
Lurks Often
Jan 2016
#106