Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NutmegYankee

(16,311 posts)
18. I think the reasonable concern with registration is mission creep.
Tue Jan 5, 2016, 12:19 AM
Jan 2016

A lot of people are concerned that once there is an inventory for each person that the government may start seeking to enter homes to either inspect storage or to prove you still have the guns in your possession. This is vastly different than when I invite the town code inspector in to inspect my new power outlets. In the latter case, the inspector is just confirming that I used the correct breaker and wiring size, installed the fire stops wherever wiring goes through a wall level, and that everything is wired correctly. He is not there to potentially build a criminal case and he isn't conducting a "search" per the 4th Amendment.

The other reasonable concern is a registry may be used to delay emergency services until an officer arrives because someone saw gun ownership as a threat and coded it into the emergency computer system. If I'm having a medical emergency and call 911, I want the help to get right inside without delay.


The previous example actually erupted a few years ago when a Republican Selectmen proposed going into people's homes to inspect gun storage. This is of course a clear violation of the 4th Amendment prohibition on unreasonable searches.
http://patch.com/massachusetts/swampscott/selectman-wants-gun-safety-enforced

If that's what it truly is, GGJohn Jan 2016 #1
The only possible objection I have is to make the DoD use smart technology on weapons Big_Mike Jan 2016 #2
There are two issues with this from my POV... Kang Colby Jan 2016 #3
Whew, thank god you are OK with it! Wow, makes me feel so much better. nt Logical Jan 2016 #4
Thanks. Kang Colby Jan 2016 #5
I am an unusual gun owner I will admit....... Logical Jan 2016 #6
Wow, I actually agree with everything you said here with one exception, GGJohn Jan 2016 #7
The government know a lot about all of us. Knowing about my guns might help track them..... Logical Jan 2016 #10
About the NRA, GGJohn Jan 2016 #11
I agree with you. I imagine most their members are not racist. Nt Logical Jan 2016 #13
I think the reasonable concern with registration is mission creep. NutmegYankee Jan 2016 #18
These Obama proposals are OK in general, but that mission creep... Eleanors38 Jan 2016 #20
Dealer DashOneBravo Jan 2016 #14
That's the long running point of contention. Kang Colby Jan 2016 #15
If you regularly DashOneBravo Jan 2016 #16
In my opinion, yes. n/t Kang Colby Jan 2016 #19
Me too DashOneBravo Jan 2016 #25
IMO, defining "dealers" is a state matter, much like selling cars... Eleanors38 Jan 2016 #21
I agree completely with that. DashOneBravo Jan 2016 #24
Well, Logical.... Kang Colby Jan 2016 #8
He's just inexplicably snippy with some of us. Eleanors38 Jan 2016 #22
Weird to focus on Trusts bolus Jan 2016 #9
Welcome to DU. Kang Colby Jan 2016 #12
It's for PR impact. Straw Man Jan 2016 #23
This message was self-deleted by its author NutmegYankee Jan 2016 #17
It's a start, and I believe that he will do more mwrguy Jan 2016 #26
I think he pretty much did everything he could legally do. Straw Man Jan 2016 #27
those are all good ideas beergood Jan 2016 #28
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Details of Executive Acti...»Reply #18