Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Gun Control & RKBA

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)

7. Wow, I actually agree with everything you said here with one exception,

Reply to Logical (Reply #6)

Mon Jan 4, 2016, 10:41 PM

Jan 2016

I don't agree with registration, and not because I'm worried about the govt. coming and taking my firearms, I just don't think the govt has any business knowing what firearms I own, but other that that, we are in complete agreement.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

28 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Details of Executive Action on Gun Control Released [View all] Kang Colby Jan 2016 OP

If that's what it truly is, GGJohn Jan 2016 #1

The only possible objection I have is to make the DoD use smart technology on weapons Big_Mike Jan 2016 #2

There are two issues with this from my POV... Kang Colby Jan 2016 #3

Whew, thank god you are OK with it! Wow, makes me feel so much better. nt Logical Jan 2016 #4

Thanks. Kang Colby Jan 2016 #5

I am an unusual gun owner I will admit....... Logical Jan 2016 #6

Wow, I actually agree with everything you said here with one exception, GGJohn Jan 2016 #7

The government know a lot about all of us. Knowing about my guns might help track them..... Logical Jan 2016 #10

About the NRA, GGJohn Jan 2016 #11

I agree with you. I imagine most their members are not racist. Nt Logical Jan 2016 #13

I think the reasonable concern with registration is mission creep. NutmegYankee Jan 2016 #18

These Obama proposals are OK in general, but that mission creep... Eleanors38 Jan 2016 #20

Dealer DashOneBravo Jan 2016 #14

That's the long running point of contention. Kang Colby Jan 2016 #15

If you regularly DashOneBravo Jan 2016 #16

In my opinion, yes. n/t Kang Colby Jan 2016 #19

Me too DashOneBravo Jan 2016 #25

IMO, defining "dealers" is a state matter, much like selling cars... Eleanors38 Jan 2016 #21

I agree completely with that. DashOneBravo Jan 2016 #24

Well, Logical.... Kang Colby Jan 2016 #8

He's just inexplicably snippy with some of us. Eleanors38 Jan 2016 #22

Weird to focus on Trusts bolus Jan 2016 #9

Welcome to DU. Kang Colby Jan 2016 #12

It's for PR impact. Straw Man Jan 2016 #23

This message was self-deleted by its author NutmegYankee Jan 2016 #17

It's a start, and I believe that he will do more mwrguy Jan 2016 #26

I think he pretty much did everything he could legally do. Straw Man Jan 2016 #27

those are all good ideas beergood Jan 2016 #28