Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Eleanors38

(18,318 posts)
8. 2 big problems: "FBI's definition of mass shooting" being the first.
Mon Nov 23, 2015, 02:07 PM
Nov 2015

The FBI defined until recently Mass Murder as four or more in one setting (not including the killer). As such, there have been just over two (2)/year, not 133 over 6+ years. Even anti-gun Mother Jones admits to the 2+/year number. Now, the number of deaths have been reduced to three. And there is now some new definition of "mass shooting," but this is Not "at least four (OR three) people are murdered..."

The other problem is with "background checks." EVERY state has a b.g. check through the NICS system. If this Guardian "article" is to have credibility, then it needs to be accurate, OR specify if the "background check" is state-generated or not. As it stands, the is another gross lack of clarity.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Fewer mass shootings occu...»Reply #8