Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: YES, THEY WANT TO TAKE YOUR GUNS AWAY [View all]beevul
(12,194 posts)29. Objectively.
If you want to talk objectively, then people obviously don't need guns - they simply want them.
Yes, and you don't NEED to ban guns, you simply want to.
I would not be opposed to opening treatment centers to help people break their addiction to guns, just like you break an addiction to heroin.
Yes, and I would not be opposed to opening treatment centers to help people break their addiction to control of others, just like you break an addiction to heroin.
A constitutionally enshrined confiscation might not eradicate gun violence 100%; but it is certainly one possible solution that could help with the problem and I'm willing to give it a try.
It would create far more gun violence than it would ever eradicate.
The gundamentalists are not eager to implement or suggest any solutions so one can only surmise they tacitly support the problem. Some might call that extremism.
Just because pro-gun folks don't support YOUR solutions, doesn't mean that they don't support any solutions. It means they don't support YOUR solution.
I've got both a suggestion, and a solution for you right here:
Focus on the .1 percent that misuse guns, and leave the 99.9x percent of us that do not, alone.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
70 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
You know, I don't fear confiscation because the controllers don't have the juice...
Eleanors38
Nov 2015
#4
So your support of something in the Constitution is not extreme but my support is?
LonePirate
Nov 2015
#20
You're essentially saying incrementalism is worse than thousands of needless deaths each year.
LonePirate
Nov 2015
#25
We may disagree on the need to repeal the 2A but I do respect your overall Constitution support
LonePirate
Nov 2015
#30
Whose approach is in question? Was this meant to be satirical or do you actually believe this?
LonePirate
Nov 2015
#12
Tens of millions may feel that right is important but tens of millions also vote Republican.
LonePirate
Nov 2015
#18
If you want to talk objectively, then people obviously don't need guns - they simply want them.
LonePirate
Nov 2015
#27
I suppose you have a Scarlet Letter system to identify that alleged .1%, right?
LonePirate
Nov 2015
#31
You said to focus on the .1% but you never said how to do it. How are we to identify them?
LonePirate
Nov 2015
#33
When multiple people are murdered regularly with a knife or billy club or other object
LonePirate
Nov 2015
#40
Gun lovers, like most lovers, will do anything to protect the beloved....that is clear enough.
Fred Sanders
Nov 2015
#62
.....snip....snip...sniping logic from the debate is of course all the gun lovers have to work with.
Fred Sanders
Nov 2015
#8
Makes sense - the only way to drastically reduce levels of gun-related crime/violence is to
jmg257
Nov 2015
#10
Reduce the number of guns is indeed the only solution now....control the guns by not having them!
Fred Sanders
Nov 2015
#47
How do you propose to get the 20-25% of the population that own guns to acquiesce?
friendly_iconoclast
Nov 2015
#57
Gun love is unquenchable...you have to take away the object of the love.....the gun.
Fred Sanders
Nov 2015
#56