Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: Questions the left won't discuss about gun control, but should - and soon. [View all]Straw Man
(6,771 posts)76. Once more, Jimmy.
straw man, emph added: ......Of course: Correlation can indicate causation, but the causation must be shown
Straw man caught correcting himself, when he was about to write that 'correlation is not causation':
straw man wrote: Correlation is not ... oh, never mind
So what is your opinion today straw man? is it not? or it can be?
Straw man caught correcting himself, when he was about to write that 'correlation is not causation':
straw man wrote: Correlation is not ... oh, never mind
So what is your opinion today straw man? is it not? or it can be?
Smoke is not fire. Smoke can indicate fire. Assuming that any airborne particulate is smoke and therefore indicates the presence of fire is just bad science, Jimmy. More information is needed.
See how that works?
straw man: Belief despite the absence of proof? I believe that's called "faith," Jimmy, not "science."
No it's also called a 'hypothesis', which is science. Duh.
No it's also called a 'hypothesis', which is science. Duh.
"Hypothesis" is not the same thing as "belief." If they are equivalent things to you, then your "science" is severely flawed. You drew a conclusion based entirely on correlation because it accorded with what you like to "believe." That's not science.
Duh, indeed.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
160 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Questions the left won't discuss about gun control, but should - and soon. [View all]
EdwardBernays
Oct 2015
OP
sure but you would need to PROVE that your law would absolutely improve...
discntnt_irny_srcsm
Oct 2015
#16
Yup, Ireland's always been such a peacful, safe place with no violence to speak of
DonP
Oct 2015
#75
Your WaPo articles speaks to gun violence, not violence as a whole as GE was speaking.
Nuclear Unicorn
Oct 2015
#54
Welcome. I will respond when I have time to consider your questions thoroughly...
Eleanors38
Oct 2015
#19
I would restrict concealed carry permits to trained professionals with a demonstrated need.
Maedhros
Oct 2015
#27
I wasn't suggesting that it was. I was simply pointing out that a carrying populace does not
Kang Colby
Oct 2015
#34
"Too bad no one but the two of us is reading it." Incorrect, unfortunately for the Stuart heir
friendly_iconoclast
Oct 2015
#160
I currently "live with" tens of thousands of alcohol-related deaths a year...
Eleanors38
Oct 2015
#80
I should have said that there are no mass killings in other countries like in the US.
guillaumeb
Oct 2015
#104
Let's see two threads today about people getting shot by reckless concealed carry
upaloopa
Oct 2015
#127