Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: Want a gun? Take a bullet: [View all]gejohnston
(17,502 posts)48. the right of self defense
and the best means to do so for starters. Remember, places that don't allow guns for other than sporting use don't allow other means of self defense, including less than lethal. The choice between armed vs armed and unarmed vs unarmed is a false dichotomy. Just because it is harder to get a gun, or anything else, legally doesn't mean it is just as difficult to get it illegally. According to the media I have read, it is very easy to get an illegal gun in Australia. The guys that attacked Charlie Hebdo and the deli with automatic weapons bought the select fire AKs, sub machine guns, and a rocket launcher at a Brussels train station.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
109 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
No, because I'm not in favor of repealing the 5th amendment. Moreover -I think the 2nd amendment is
MillennialDem
Oct 2015
#45
of course people should have rights. its just a matter of what should and
MillennialDem
Oct 2015
#36
I'm aware the BoR is a set of negative rights. I'm just wondering why you think the right to
MillennialDem
Oct 2015
#44
It's not a false dichotomy. It's about likely vs unlikely. In a society with no (or few) legal guns
MillennialDem
Oct 2015
#49
Apples to oranges comparisons and anecdotes. Face it, compared to most of the developed
MillennialDem
Oct 2015
#58
Gini index isn't a valid comparison imo, I'd say median income and median net worth are better
MillennialDem
Oct 2015
#64
I don't think guns are about self defense though - I think they're more about self
MillennialDem
Oct 2015
#46
No one is forcing you to own a gun, the decision on whether to possess or carry firearms
branford
Oct 2015
#53
Stop with the "don't even bother trying to get rid of the 2nd amendment" nonsense. Gay marriage was
MillennialDem
Oct 2015
#54
Those are not scientific studies because they are not falsifiable. Produce a falsifiable study if
MillennialDem
Oct 2015
#60
Peer reviewed does not mean the same thing as scientific (most importantly, falsifiable)
MillennialDem
Oct 2015
#67
I'm quite aware it's a heavy lift to change the constitution. I'm also a fan of moderate
MillennialDem
Oct 2015
#75
LOL - interesting, given that I have no fucking clue what study you think I'm getting my
MillennialDem
Oct 2015
#65
Well, then it's a good thing we don't only have a right to keep and bear "guns."
branford
Oct 2015
#103
You simply are choosing to conveniently ignore every incident of a defensive firearm use
branford
Oct 2015
#77
Why don't we just make them weigh 375 pounds? Not very many people will be totin' them around.
BlueJazz
Oct 2015
#3
Possibly the most moronic (and nasty) article I have ever read on "gun control".......
pablo_marmol
Oct 2015
#11
The anti's sure a violent bunch, kinda goes along with the authoritarian way of life
ileus
Oct 2015
#12
If you're compassionate why do you want to criminalize people who are not a threat?
Nuclear Unicorn
Oct 2015
#83
The gun show is immaterial; it's private sales which you cannot track without registration.
Nuclear Unicorn
Oct 2015
#104
"I'm concerned about accidents, domestic violence, kids shooting kids (or parents), school shootings
Nuclear Unicorn
Oct 2015
#107