Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: Want a gun? Take a bullet: [View all]sarisataka
(21,007 posts)38. My question is
What is a right?
Whether or not we agree with a right, does it cease to exist if it is not codified?
Using the 5th as an example- if repealed would the government be justified in forcing you to testify even if it is incriminating? I would say no because we have a natural right to remain silent in the face of accusations. To compel testimony would be an abrogation of that right regardless of 5th Amendment guarantee.
If I understand you, it would be acceptable to compel testimony without explicit protection.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
109 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
No, because I'm not in favor of repealing the 5th amendment. Moreover -I think the 2nd amendment is
MillennialDem
Oct 2015
#45
of course people should have rights. its just a matter of what should and
MillennialDem
Oct 2015
#36
I'm aware the BoR is a set of negative rights. I'm just wondering why you think the right to
MillennialDem
Oct 2015
#44
It's not a false dichotomy. It's about likely vs unlikely. In a society with no (or few) legal guns
MillennialDem
Oct 2015
#49
Apples to oranges comparisons and anecdotes. Face it, compared to most of the developed
MillennialDem
Oct 2015
#58
Gini index isn't a valid comparison imo, I'd say median income and median net worth are better
MillennialDem
Oct 2015
#64
I don't think guns are about self defense though - I think they're more about self
MillennialDem
Oct 2015
#46
No one is forcing you to own a gun, the decision on whether to possess or carry firearms
branford
Oct 2015
#53
Stop with the "don't even bother trying to get rid of the 2nd amendment" nonsense. Gay marriage was
MillennialDem
Oct 2015
#54
Those are not scientific studies because they are not falsifiable. Produce a falsifiable study if
MillennialDem
Oct 2015
#60
Peer reviewed does not mean the same thing as scientific (most importantly, falsifiable)
MillennialDem
Oct 2015
#67
I'm quite aware it's a heavy lift to change the constitution. I'm also a fan of moderate
MillennialDem
Oct 2015
#75
LOL - interesting, given that I have no fucking clue what study you think I'm getting my
MillennialDem
Oct 2015
#65
Well, then it's a good thing we don't only have a right to keep and bear "guns."
branford
Oct 2015
#103
You simply are choosing to conveniently ignore every incident of a defensive firearm use
branford
Oct 2015
#77
Why don't we just make them weigh 375 pounds? Not very many people will be totin' them around.
BlueJazz
Oct 2015
#3
Possibly the most moronic (and nasty) article I have ever read on "gun control".......
pablo_marmol
Oct 2015
#11
The anti's sure a violent bunch, kinda goes along with the authoritarian way of life
ileus
Oct 2015
#12
If you're compassionate why do you want to criminalize people who are not a threat?
Nuclear Unicorn
Oct 2015
#83
The gun show is immaterial; it's private sales which you cannot track without registration.
Nuclear Unicorn
Oct 2015
#104
"I'm concerned about accidents, domestic violence, kids shooting kids (or parents), school shootings
Nuclear Unicorn
Oct 2015
#107