Gun Control & RKBA

edgineered

(2,101 posts)

18. Concur with petronius and kang colby,

Reply to discntnt_irny_srcsm (Original post)

Tue Oct 13, 2015, 07:34 AM

Oct 2015

to wit, distrust of authorities to circumvent due process and loss of stature at bargaining table.

eta: for example, someone not unlike some of the malicious posters to this group could easily report that organized gun owners plan to demonstrate or gather at a public place at such a time and place and such activity is threatening to them and is within x number of feet from y, a safe zone for example. Another case could be that a threat was received, real or not, and for public safety all weapons within a given area are to be accounted or worse until expiration of a given time (that time would then be challenged), etc, etc.

Off to work now..

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

50 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Universal Background Checks for firearms [View all] discntnt_irny_srcsm Oct 2015 OP

No. Better to repeal the 2nd Amendment. (nt) stone space Oct 2015 #1

As usual... discntnt_irny_srcsm Oct 2015 #2

Giving Gun Worshipers another Amendment to further Sanctify their Religion is not an step forward. stone space Oct 2015 #3

Neither is your course toward cultural purity. n/t discntnt_irny_srcsm Oct 2015 #4

Wow! GGJohn Oct 2015 #13

He does good Duckhunter935 Oct 2015 #20

"Religion?" I don't think you'd like my holy water. Eleanors38 Oct 2015 #29

I'm an atheist. I don't want your religion forced on me. (nt) stone space Oct 2015 #36

Oh, no force necessary. At my age, it flows freely! Eleanors38 Oct 2015 #37

I'm not a gun worshiper. (nt) stone space Oct 2015 #38

Cool, either am I Duckhunter935 Oct 2015 #41

Cool, GGJohn Oct 2015 #45

You spend a lot time trying to force your views on the rest of us Lurks Often Oct 2015 #40

Almost like Duckhunter935 Oct 2015 #42

By all means, get off the couch and get started DonP Oct 2015 #5

It's the OP asking for a new Amendment. Suggest you take it up with him. stone space Oct 2015 #7

So, as usual, sit on your hands instead of standing up for what you believe in DonP Oct 2015 #8

He sure likes that public funding Duckhunter935 Oct 2015 #21

The word you're searching for: "Indolent." nt Eleanors38 Oct 2015 #30

Indolent, lazy, cheap, ineffectual, they all work. n/t DonP Oct 2015 #43

You're the one who want's to repeal the 2A, GGJohn Oct 2015 #14

What fantasy land do you live where that is remotely possible? Lurks Often Oct 2015 #10

He says he lives in the real world Duckhunter935 Oct 2015 #22

Just because he says it, certainly doesn't make it true. Lurks Often Oct 2015 #24

Where the unicorn farts rainbows over Michgan Avenue! Eleanors38 Oct 2015 #31

Well then, you should get right on it. GGJohn Oct 2015 #12

Yes add Oklahoma Duckhunter935 Oct 2015 #23

Finally. One of those 'second amendment extremists' I've heard so much about... beevul Oct 2015 #25

Bugs you, huh? (nt) stone space Oct 2015 #34

Not in the least, GGJohn Oct 2015 #46

All I can give you is a big MAYBE. beemer27 Oct 2015 #6

You're welcome and thanks for the thoughtful reply discntnt_irny_srcsm Oct 2015 #9

No, because I don't think that structure would do any good petronius Oct 2015 #11

The criteria would be being found guilty of crime... discntnt_irny_srcsm Oct 2015 #15

I am against UBCs without real compromise. Kang Colby Oct 2015 #16

Sounds great but one question discntnt_irny_srcsm Oct 2015 #17

"E" is just too inflamatory for gun control people. It makes them crazy. DonP Oct 2015 #19

Its because 'E' has three barrels... beevul Oct 2015 #26

Sounds like my experience with describing Chicago gun laws as Jim (large, raucous black bird). Eleanors38 Oct 2015 #32

Edited. See Don P's post for an explanation. Kang Colby Oct 2015 #47

good work n/t discntnt_irny_srcsm Oct 2015 #50

Concur with petronius and kang colby, edgineered Oct 2015 #18

This is a reasonable proposal for this gun owner...Controllers? Not so much. Eleanors38 Oct 2015 #27

Why? They make progress on gun control, specifically background checks Kang Colby Oct 2015 #48

I am skeptical because much of the rhetoric here and elsewhere is characterized... Eleanors38 Oct 2015 #49

Hmmm... deathrind Oct 2015 #28

"...believe drugs should be illegal?" From The Anti-Ammosexual Handbook of Reality? Eleanors38 Oct 2015 #33

you do need a license to sell firearms gejohnston Oct 2015 #35

Thats the problem with unrealistic thinking... beevul Oct 2015 #39

Before you double down on your "believe drugs should be illegal" statement... beardown Oct 2015 #44