Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
6. Yes. Make your own decision. These are statistics, and people living in isolated areas
Tue Oct 6, 2015, 11:57 AM
Oct 2015

might want to look at specific statistics for isolated areas.

But guns can be very hazardous in the home. People should consider the statistics before deciding whether a gun will make them, in their specific situation, safer or perhaps less safe.

It's a decision that each person has to make.

My dad always said: If someone wants to kill me, they will have to bring their own gun.

That's one view of it.

I am trying to present objective information that can help people make a decision. There is pressure from both the pro-gun and the anti-gun sides to persuade people to sort of "join up."

Whether you want a gun in your home or not can be a life or death decision.

And having the gun does not necessarily mean saving lives. It can mean quite the opposite.

It is a personal decision, but we need information to make the best decision for our situation.

This has been hashed over for years. Still keeping mine. nt Eleanors38 Oct 2015 #1
Not safer, just able to respond without waiting from 30min - 12 years. ileus Oct 2015 #2
Good for you ... don't particularly care what you or Mother Jones thinks DonP Oct 2015 #3
Please feel free to... discntnt_irny_srcsm Oct 2015 #4
Yes. Make your own decision. These are statistics, and people living in isolated areas JDPriestly Oct 2015 #6
Just to piss off people that want to ban it.... NT virginia mountainman Oct 2015 #5
Any coherent study... deathrind Oct 2015 #7
I own guns for recreation. nt hack89 Oct 2015 #8
You're unhealthy...may I recommend a dietary supplement? ileus Oct 2015 #14
Mother Jones debunked gejohnston Oct 2015 #9
Hmmm, debunked by a gun worship site that louis-t Oct 2015 #10
Also remember, the CDC is banned from doing research about gun deaths. louis-t Oct 2015 #11
Ummm, no, not really - CDC Ban Lifted by President Obama DonP Oct 2015 #12
Mass shootings are declining? louis-t Oct 2015 #15
CDC data collection discntnt_irny_srcsm Oct 2015 #17
By the way, nice cherry-picking of the report. louis-t Oct 2015 #16
See post #17 and read it slowly this time. DonP Oct 2015 #18
Did you actually read the article associated with the quote? louis-t Oct 2015 #24
the problem with that study was not that the NRA didn't like it gejohnston Oct 2015 #27
So, the solution was to give the NRA louis-t Oct 2015 #28
the ban isn't on research gejohnston Oct 2015 #30
And you are only focusing on parts of the studies that you don't like. louis-t Oct 2015 #31
according to leading criminologists at the time gejohnston Oct 2015 #34
Wait, now the ban is on 'lobbying'? louis-t Oct 2015 #36
the CDC is part of the government gejohnston Oct 2015 #37
Yes. As it SHOULD BE. wanna lobby? Do it on your own tab. nt Eleanors38 Oct 2015 #58
If you're interested, here's an interesting article detailing the issues branford Oct 2015 #35
So you send me another opinion piece? louis-t Oct 2015 #40
So, studies and research you agree with are "facts," branford Oct 2015 #42
You think the NRA will ever "compromise"? louis-t Oct 2015 #46
what are willing to give up in return? gejohnston Oct 2015 #47
All my guns. You? stone space Oct 2015 #53
First, the NRA need not compromise. They're actually almost irrelevant. branford Oct 2015 #48
Define "extraordinarily rare". louis-t Oct 2015 #66
What percentage of the 80-100+ million legal firearm owners branford Oct 2015 #67
Throwing in percentage versus number of mass shootings is diversion. louis-t Oct 2015 #68
Violent crime has been cut by about half in the last few decades, branford Oct 2015 #70
The relative frequency of gun deaths in other countries that permit guns -- Switzerland and JDPriestly Oct 2015 #19
there are an infinite possiblities gejohnston Oct 2015 #22
We need real research on this issue, not just assumptions and unfounded conclusions. JDPriestly Oct 2015 #23
suicides and gangs gejohnston Oct 2015 #25
As long as the NRA is allowed to defeat funding for research louis-t Oct 2015 #29
Good point! JDPriestly Oct 2015 #32
That will never happen. louis-t Oct 2015 #38
to quote ethics blogger Josh Marshall gejohnston Oct 2015 #39
defending nra here, how low can u go jimmy the one Oct 2015 #43
truth bother you Jimmy? gejohnston Oct 2015 #45
alarmed at your ethics jimmy the one Oct 2015 #62
just as I expected gejohnston Oct 2015 #71
gun fly in the ointment jimmy the one Oct 2015 #41
Um no, the CDC gun research ban was not lifted by Obama. SunSeeker Oct 2015 #52
I tried to tell him that already. louis-t Oct 2015 #69
It all depends on the definition of "safer" being used. ManiacJoe Oct 2015 #13
Apparently the statistical evidence is either mixed on that or differently interpreted. JDPriestly Oct 2015 #20
Your inquiry is certainly reasonable, branford Oct 2015 #21
but it does not fit into 140 Duckhunter935 Oct 2015 #26
I don't tweet -- I'm a little, too, to use a euphemism, verbal for that. JDPriestly Oct 2015 #33
The difference is going to be largely cultural. ManiacJoe Oct 2015 #44
The majority of car accidents happen within 5 miles of your home. uppityperson Oct 2015 #49
True. I suppose that is where we drive the most often, where we pay the least attention and JDPriestly Oct 2015 #50
A lot of those "Accidents" and about 20k of those suicides are gun deaths. nt SunSeeker Oct 2015 #51
20K gejohnston Oct 2015 #54
21,175 according to the CDC. SunSeeker Oct 2015 #57
I'm sure you can provide a link or are you making things up Lurks Often Oct 2015 #55
Sure. The stats on kids getting shot by accident are revolting. SunSeeker Oct 2015 #56
And that rate has been falling for years: Gun-owners acting responsibly. Eleanors38 Oct 2015 #59
Not the accidental and gun suicide death rate. Just crime. SunSeeker Oct 2015 #60
And "crime" has been going down or up? Eleanors38 Oct 2015 #65
Crime is going down as our population ages. nt SunSeeker Oct 2015 #72
CDC 2013 numbers Lurks Often Oct 2015 #61
Says a lot about you that you think 69 young kids needlessly dying each year is "not a lot." SunSeeker Oct 2015 #63
It says a lot about YOU that you define .0019 percent as a lot Lurks Often Oct 2015 #64
Per CDC, 505 of the 130,557 annual accidental deaths are gun deaths. That's .39% SunSeeker Oct 2015 #73
It's .0019 percent of ALL deaths in the United States in 2013 Lurks Often Oct 2015 #74
What is the point of comparing gun deaths to age-related deaths? Everyone dies. SunSeeker Oct 2015 #75
Work on your own logic and stop moving the goal posts Lurks Often Oct 2015 #76
People who want reasonable gun control are not "extremists." SunSeeker Oct 2015 #77
You care so much that you post about Chicago, Newark & DC a lot, oh wait, you don't. Lurks Often Oct 2015 #78
Americans do support gun control, it's our NRA fearing politicians that don't. SunSeeker Oct 2015 #79
You can't have it both ways Lurks Often Oct 2015 #80
It isn't the NRA's GOTV, it is the NRA's money spreading lies about Dem candidates. SunSeeker Oct 2015 #81
If it makes you feel better to think that then go ahead Lurks Often Oct 2015 #82
No, guns are inanimate... discntnt_irny_srcsm Oct 2015 #83
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Guns. Do they make us sa...»Reply #6