Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: Weapons common on Oregon college campus despite 'gun-free zone' [View all]Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)8. Respectfully, carrying a weapon is for self-defense, not strategic law enforcement...
If a weapon-carrier is three buildings down, he/she won't do much good.
If the weapon-carrier is confronted by a murderer, he/she might do some good to preserve his/her life.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
70 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
It was a video, not a tweet- but she still said it *and you know it, as you replied to it*:
friendly_iconoclast
Oct 2015
#42
Also, Shannon Watts is demonstrated liar and a poor excuse for a Democrat...
friendly_iconoclast
Oct 2015
#43
I believe my examples met your criteria. Whether *you* agree or disagree is not my concern n/t
friendly_iconoclast
Oct 2015
#54
Shannon Watts is a proven liar and a piss-poor excuse for a Democrat
friendly_iconoclast
Oct 2015
#51
Don't take the shouting and handwaving too much to heart- we're dealing with a version of these:
friendly_iconoclast
Oct 2015
#61
Respectfully, carrying a weapon is for self-defense, not strategic law enforcement...
Eleanors38
Oct 2015
#8
I believe one of gejohnston's graphics best describes the situation:
friendly_iconoclast
Oct 2015
#58
That should be changed. No reason to coddle terrorists on university campuses.
stone space
Oct 2015
#9