Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: What would be the most efficient means of keeping guns away from criminals? [View all]beevul
(12,194 posts)53. Thanks.
Best way would be to not make guns available, period. I do NOT advocate that, btw, but it is the obvious solution.
"Obvious" and "best way" only to those who default to the parochial logic of focusing on the instrument.
The best way, is for those that can not be trusted with a gun, not to be able to walk freely through a society full of guns unsupervised.
But problems don't get solved without a desire to solve them.
Those who can not be trusted with a gun are the problem, not the guns themselves.
And yet, "how do we deal with the people that should not have guns, while respecting everyone else?" asked no anti-gun person. Ever.
Including you.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
142 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
What would be the most efficient means of keeping guns away from criminals? [View all]
Nuclear Unicorn
Aug 2015
OP
The most efficient way would be to make gun possession in public illegal
Starboard Tack
Aug 2015
#10
Why not just aggravate the sentence of any crime committed with a gun? People who aren't
Nuclear Unicorn
Aug 2015
#11
"it could be argued that convicted felons who carry guns responsibly are not criminals"
Nuclear Unicorn
Aug 2015
#14
So the right to defend oneself with a gun excludes millions of Americans
Starboard Tack
Aug 2015
#20
First you grouse that law-aiding people are carrying. Now you're grousing convicted criminals aren't
Nuclear Unicorn
Aug 2015
#21
I claim no such thing. They exist and, if they carry, they may be scared too.
Starboard Tack
Aug 2015
#59
There's also fires, personal injuries, natural disasters, etc. but I doubt you
Nuclear Unicorn
Sep 2015
#120
No, but I'd think someone carrying a fire extinguisher around may have a problem
Starboard Tack
Sep 2015
#122
I think it's safe to say you have pretty well nicked the scourge of women carrying
Nuclear Unicorn
Sep 2015
#138
Because 'judge' is the the root of 'prejudiced'- and you *are* prejudiced
friendly_iconoclast
Sep 2015
#121
"Windows has been updated about 9 times in 20 years and it is still far from perfect."
Nuclear Unicorn
Aug 2015
#70
"Do you think the rest of us are stupid, or that we live in a repressive society?"
beevul
Aug 2015
#73
Your interlocutor seems to have suddenly lost interest in your conversation
friendly_iconoclast
Aug 2015
#80
Yes, you proved we prefer reliability over phobia driven fantasies. Golly but you're clever.
Nuclear Unicorn
Aug 2015
#55
"there are no stats to show that people sometimes get killed with their own guns"
Nuclear Unicorn
Aug 2015
#58
You can give up if you wish but if you're certain RFID devices are so awesome
Nuclear Unicorn
Aug 2015
#88
OMG I am so glad I don't live in a world where those questions need to be asked
Starboard Tack
Aug 2015
#89
There's no violent crime in your world or do the police always arrive in time?
Nuclear Unicorn
Aug 2015
#90
"(W)e will just continue down the path we have been on for decades..." Lower crime rates?
friendly_iconoclast
Aug 2015
#45
That's what I was thinking --- but my answer would be "D" to that question. (other)
pablo_marmol
Aug 2015
#40
"Not easy in a country where half the population still lives in the 19th century."
pablo_marmol
Aug 2015
#103
Both A and B, with mandatory open carry it caring it in public. The Reason.
LiberalArkie
Sep 2015
#132