Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Gun Control & RKBA

Showing Original Post only (View all)

alp227

(32,462 posts)
Wed May 22, 2013, 02:16 PM May 2013

"Some people dislike gays. Others dislike guns. We should not base our laws on personal dislikes." [View all]





(The other poster reads, in case your browser can't display image or the link dies, "We won our right to marry...now it's time to defend our right!&quot

As Seattle alt weekly The Stranger (which also is the home of Dan Savage's advice column) reports:

The QR code on all of the posters lead to the same pro-gun website that prompts readers to decide whether guns are a liability or a useful tool. If you click on the "right" answer—useful tool—you're directed to a series of pro-gun links that affirm your choice. If you click on the "wrong" answer—liability—you're ushered through a series of increasingly paranoid and/or off topic questions that equate cyber crime and prohibition with gun crime, or hypothesize how many criminals you'll have to fight off in your life time. Each question is multiple choice, like this:

The proper response to an arson is...

1) prohibit you and other law-abiding citizens from buying gasoline.
2) prohibit you and other law-abiding citizens from buying any flammable fluids, matches and lighters.
3) prosecute the perpetrator of the crime

The questionnaire is supposed to underscore how important it is for you to be armed to the teeth all times. The arguments aren't new or particularly convincing, I just find it striking that a traditionally conservative movement is branching out to recruit gays and lesbians.

It's hard to know who's responsible for putting the posters up all over Capitol Hill. "Nale Dixon," who's credited for drawing the cartoon of the gay couple, returns no search results online. The pro-gun website is run by a dude named Oleg Volk, "An American," but that doesn't necessarily mean he's responsible for papering the hill with them. Without someone to credit, it's impossible to glean the posterer's intentions.


Capitol Hill in Seattle is Seattle's equivalent of San Francisco's Castro district essentially as Capitol Hill has a large LGBT community.

Really? Using guns to defend a gay marriage? Does the poster really think the people in CH will really buy into that "guns defend liberty" BS that the right has been peddling for years? And then that other poster equating guns and gay people as "personal dislikes" due to both being targeted by laws...another big WTF.
39 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I see no reason why gun manufactures would upaloopa May 2013 #1
Hmm. Adult LGBTs and adult women in general are "dupes" Eleanors38 May 2013 #9
You never get it do you? upaloopa May 2013 #16
I don't get your paternalistic & paranoid outlook, no. Eleanors38 May 2013 #17
are you saying beergood Sep 2015 #23
If i was afraid TeddyR Sep 2015 #38
This seems to be the latest gun nutter tactic. rdharma May 2013 #2
Right. Because guns and gay people are the same. Just when you think the nuttery can't get nuttier. Squinch May 2013 #3
"Right. Because guns and gay people are the same." pablo_marmol Sep 2015 #25
The post is equating dislike of guns with dislike of gay people. It's a moronic point. Squinch Sep 2015 #37
Sure - the first sentence of the first graphic indicates that -- I'll give you that. pablo_marmol Sep 2015 #39
+1000 TubbersUK Sep 2015 #31
can't compare a moral imperative to a matter of convenience nt msongs May 2013 #4
Some people just like control over others. ileus May 2013 #5
Torturing logic till it begs for mercy... Jeezus H. Christ... nomorenomore08 May 2013 #6
Oleg Volk gejohnston May 2013 #7
I'm confused DonP May 2013 #12
"But everyone is missing the point." pablo_marmol Sep 2015 #26
Rights is Rights Jim Levy May 2013 #8
^^^ This. Eleanors38 May 2013 #10
Very well said. Lizzie Poppet May 2013 #11
The 60s? Compared to now when most of the gun control mania is due to... jmg257 May 2013 #13
We have a much lower crime rate than the 60s... Eleanors38 May 2013 #15
I like it. NYC_SKP May 2013 #14
You make an excellent point. ileus Sep 2015 #18
Kick from 2013 replying to a troll. It's how we know you're not serious and just trolling the group. SecularMotion Sep 2015 #19
If kicking old threads makes someone a troll, what's your defense when you do it in this forum, branford Sep 2015 #20
Gun control advocacy in its present form is all about special pleading friendly_iconoclast Sep 2015 #21
I notice no one cried about your abusive post like they did with NUs. ileus Sep 2015 #22
Gotta love those double-standards, don't you? pablo_marmol Sep 2015 #28
The fact Controllers like Bloomberg and Brock do not abide by the standards they demand be Nuclear Unicorn Sep 2015 #36
LOL --- not serious and just trolling the group. pablo_marmol Sep 2015 #24
Ever cleaned off your gay and had an accidental discharge? DJ13 Sep 2015 #27
"Ever cleaned your gay and had an accidental discharge?" beergood Sep 2015 #32
Too Stupid to even discuss CBGLuthier Sep 2015 #29
"Yeah how many people were killed in gay massacres in the US last year? " beergood Sep 2015 #35
Pink Pistols is a fine organization bluestateguy Sep 2015 #30
+10000 beergood Sep 2015 #33
Horrible get the red out Sep 2015 #34
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»"Some people dislike gays...»Reply #0