HEALTH AND SCIENCE
Abortion pill mifepristone ruling in Texas case could hinge on 1873 Comstock Act
PUBLISHED TUE, MAR 21 2023 | 10:43 AM EDT | UPDATED 4 HOURS AGO
KEY POINTS
• U.S. District Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk raised the Comstock Act repeatedly in last week’s hearing in the case challenging FDA approval of mifepristone.
• The 1873 Comstock Act declared “obscene” materials as not mailable, including drugs advertised for use in abortions.
• The Comstock Act hasn’t been enforced in decades. The DOJ says it doesn’t ban mail delivery of mifepristone, citing court cases that narrowed the law’s scope.
• But Kacsmaryk could potentially issue an order invoking the Comstock Act to roll back FDA regulatory changes that allowed mifepristone mail delivery.
A federal judge in Texas may try to invoke an obscure 19th-century law called the Comstock Act to roll back mail delivery of the abortion pill mifepristone.
Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk of the U.S. Northern District of Texas heard
oral arguments Wednesday in a closely watched case in which medical associations who oppose abortion are challenging the Food and Drug Administration’s approval of mifepristone. At the hearing’s conclusion, Kacsmaryk said the court will issue an order and opinion “as soon as possible.”
The central aim of the Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, the antiabortion group that filed the lawsuit, is to pull mifepristone from the U.S. market. But Kacsmaryk could stop short of blocking sales and instead order the FDA to impose tougher restrictions on how the pill is distributed,
legal experts said.
His rationale could hinge in part on the Comstock Act. He raised the 1873 law repeatedly during last week’s hearing, and appeared more sympathetic to the arguments laid out by the Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine’s attorneys than those presented by the government’s lawyers.
{snip}
= new reply since forum marked as read