Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Pets

GiqueCee

(3,168 posts)

4. Their stables of corporate lawyers...

Reply to 3catwoman3 (Reply #2)

Sat Dec 6, 2025, 09:34 AM

Saturday

... are attacking the low-hanging fruit, as it were, to justify their over-priced existence. Such petty malice does nothing to enhance their already rancid reputations. They could have gained tons of good will by chuckling along with the jokes, and maybe even featuring Dogue in some of their photo shoots. Instead, they went full curmudgeon, and sullied their reps even further. Not very smart.
Going after Sony's just shows what lowlife bullies they really are.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Cond Nast Sues Dog-Fashion Magazine Dogue Over 'Vogue' Marks [View all] douglas9 Saturday OP

Oh, for Pete's sake. How petty. sinkingfeeling Saturday #1

Years ago, there was a vendor in the wonderful... 3catwoman3 Saturday #2

Their stables of corporate lawyers... GiqueCee Saturday #4

Unfortunately, all of these examples are quirks of the US Trademark laws vs. corporate pettiness. CincyDem Saturday #5

There's a pet spa near me that goes by the name of Groomingdale's. cloudbase Saturday #3