Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
14. I think in the responses to you, you can see the lingering damage caused by George W. Bush
Sat Apr 6, 2013, 01:37 PM
Apr 2013

There are clearly humanitarian reasons to go to war. After day 5 in Rwanda, we should have gone to war and stopped it. 800,000 people were killed in 100 days in that genocide. We probably could have stopped the deaths of 700,000+ of those people with minimal casualties inflicted.

Because of George W. Bush, there is no possibility that the left in this country will accept the idea of a humanitarian war for a long time. The US will have to stand idly by while these kinds of things happen because false equivalencies will be raised.

Every country has natural resources of SOME kind. Any suggested humanitarian action will be termed as a grab for those resources. Every justification would be challenged as a smokescreen. As I said, false equivalencies to Iraq are the norm on the left now.

I think that what the Taliban in Afghanistan were doing to women justified a war to remove them before 9/11 even came about. Of course, Bush had no interest in those issues and did little to nothing to stop them with that war during his tenure.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»Feminists»Is there a feminist reaso...»Reply #14