Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Feminists

erpowers

(9,358 posts)

30. What's Really Sad

Reply to LadyHawkAZ (Original post)

Wed May 15, 2013, 07:21 PM

May 2013

For me the saddest thing is that Ms. Chapman does not have control over her creation and gets no royalties from sales of the character. Ms Chapman did an interview with CNN and told the anchors that because this is an animation she does not have any control over the character even though she created the character. She also said she does not get any share of the money Disney makes off of the character.

I think that rule should be changed. She should get royalties from the sells that come from this character. In addition, if she wants she should be able to have some control over what changes are made to the character she created.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

40 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

‘Brave’ creator blasts Disney for ‘blatant sexism’ in princess makeover [View all] LadyHawkAZ May 2013 OP

A choice between Brave ... DreamGypsy May 2013 #1

they made her into a garden-variety gamer 'ho Skittles May 2013 #2

Is the character's creator related to you? LadyHawkAZ May 2013 #4

I..........ER................ Skittles May 2013 #5

PLEASE DON'T KICK MY ASS! LadyHawkAZ May 2013 #6

Hawks are pretty formidable but..... Skittles May 2013 #8

I hate the after version. nt Kalidurga May 2013 #3

Kind of surprised they didn't turn her into a AsahinaKimi May 2013 #15

Yes. Here's the next version: LiberalLovinLug May 2013 #36

me too .... littlewolf May 2013 #21

amen DonCoquixote May 2013 #7

Perhaps A Disney Princess Needs To Look Like They "Work The Pole" or "Need The D". TheBlackAdder May 2013 #9

We noticed this because Tien1985 May 2013 #10

Good for Ms. Chapman... ljm2002 May 2013 #11

Can't let realistic girls impinge on Disney fantasies. Gormy Cuss May 2013 #12

...and add 10 or 15 years to her age. LadyHawkAZ May 2013 #13

But a young woman, not one old enough to have plenty of life experiences. Gormy Cuss May 2013 #14

I'm so glad she raised a stink about this. Starry Messenger May 2013 #16

Ugh. kimmylavin May 2013 #17

the fuckability quotient was too low. BlancheSplanchnik May 2013 #25

REAL Merida may already have won! cactusfractal May 2013 #18

ugghh Borchkins May 2013 #19

The doll they have on the site AmyDeLune May 2013 #23

Signed the petition. n/t TDale313 May 2013 #27

As surprising as dawn Half-Century Man May 2013 #20

I still can't stand Disney MrScorpio May 2013 #22

A have NOT watch the movie, but she reminds me of the Ancient Sarmatians happyslug May 2013 #24

saving to read this later! BlancheSplanchnik May 2013 #26

Um, excuse me; but it was totally sexist BEFORE the makeover. snot May 2013 #28

How is the older version Sexists? happyslug May 2013 #29

How so? SnakeEyes May 2013 #33

Sorry; to be clear, I was thinking of the whole movie, not her outfit. snot May 2013 #35

What's Really Sad erpowers May 2013 #30

Other than a different dress NewJeffCT May 2013 #31

The dress material has been changed from plain to sparkly, LadyHawkAZ May 2013 #32

More makeup, hourglass figure wtmusic May 2013 #34

The problem is that it sells.... davidn3600 May 2013 #37

Disney capitulated to the 'known' - woman as penis prop. toby jo May 2013 #38

I won't fully disagree, but the marketing is aimed to girls davidn3600 May 2013 #39

In the first one they made her look self-sufficient and powerful... Jasana May 2013 #40